Rule 96.11.Court May Order Sale Without Appointment of Commissioners.
Part III · Rule 96: Partition of Real and Personal Property · Last amended January 1, 1981 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 96.11
Amendment History
Adopted June 5, 1980, eff. Jan. 1, 1981.
Official Comment
This is substantially the same as that portion of prior Rule 96.53 which precedes the first semi-colon.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 96.11 streamlines the process for cases where a physical division of the land is clearly not workable. Ordinarily, when a court orders partition in kind, Rule 96.12 requires it to appoint three commissioners to carry out the actual division on the ground. But that step exists to help split land that can reasonably be split.
When the court already finds that partition in kind cannot happen without great prejudice to the owners — meaning splitting the property would harm its value or usefulness in a way that hurts the parties — there is no point sending the case to commissioners to try anyway. Rule 96.11 lets the court skip that step entirely and order a sale directly.
This saves time and expense in the class of cases where the outcome is not really in doubt: a small lot, a single structure, or an oddly configured tract that cannot be divided into separate parcels without destroying value. The court can move straight to ordering the sale procedures the rest of the chapter lays out, instead of incurring the cost of commissioners whose report would likely reach the same conclusion.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can the court skip appointing commissioners?
When the court finds that partition in kind cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners, it may order a sale without appointing commissioners.
Is appointing commissioners always required before a sale?
No, Rule 96.11 provides an exception allowing a direct order of sale in cases where physical division is clearly not feasible.
What does 'great prejudice to the owners' generally refer to?
It refers to the harm that would come from physically dividing land that cannot be split into useful parcels among the owners without a loss in value.
Why does this rule save time and expense?
It avoids the cost and delay of appointing and paying commissioners in cases where a physical division was never going to be workable in the first place.
What happens after the court orders a sale under this rule?
The case proceeds through the sale procedures the rest of Rule 96 sets out, including the order of sale, notice, and distribution of proceeds.