Rule 1006.Venue. Change of Venue.
Last amended February 18, 2026 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1006
Plain-English Summary
This rule is Pennsylvania’s venue rule. An action against an individual may be brought only in a county where the individual may be served, where the cause of action arose, where a transaction or occurrence took place, where venue is authorized by law, or where the property at issue is located when equitable relief as to it is sought.
Other situations have their own rules. Venue for corporations, partnerships, and other entities is set by separate rules, and a joint or joint-and-several action against multiple defendants may be brought in any county of proper venue as to one of them. The court may transfer an action for the convenience of parties and witnesses, or where a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the county.
Venue objections are use-it-or-lose-it. Improper venue must be raised by preliminary objection; if it is not raised that way, it is waived.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where can I sue an individual in Pennsylvania?
Only in a county where the individual may be served, where the cause of action arose, where the underlying transaction or occurrence took place, where venue is authorized by law, or where the property at issue is located when equitable relief about it is sought.
How do you object to improper venue?
By preliminary objection. Improper venue not raised by preliminary objection is waived.
Can a case be moved to another county?
Yes. The court may transfer an action for the convenience of parties and witnesses, or where a fair and impartial trial cannot be held in the county.
Official Note
Comment. : For a definition of transaction or occurrence, see Craig v. W. J. Thiele & Sons, Inc., 149 A.2d 35 (Pa. 1959). For the recusal of the judge for interest or prejudice under subdivision (d)(2), see Rule 2.11 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. By Order of August 25, 2022, effective January 1, 2023 (‘‘2022 amendments’’), the Court rescinded Rule 1006(a.1), a special venue rule that applied to medical professional liability actions filed on or after January 1, 2002. Corresponding amendments removed references to Rule 1006(a.1) from Rule 2130, governing venue in an action against a partnership, Rule 2156, governing venue in an action against an unincorporated association, and Rule 2179, governing venue in an action against a corporation or similar entity. The 2022 amendments thus returned Rules 1006, 2130, 2156, and 2179 to their pre-2003 versions, pursuant to which medical professionals were governed by the same venue rules applicable to other non-governmental defendants. The 2022 amendments added a provision to each rule requiring the Civil Procedural Rules Committee to ‘‘reexamine the 2022 rule amendments two years after their effective date.’’ Rules 1006(g), 2130(d), 2156(c), and 2179(c). The committee received commentary on behalf of medical professionals asserting that the impact of the 2022 amendments could not yet be determined, and that more time was needed to develop the necessary data. By Order of February 18, 2026, the Court amended Rules 1006, 2130, 2156, and 2179 to remove the expired reexamination provisions. The Court will consider any future proposals as submitted through the Court’s usual rules committee processes.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 1006 amended through June 20, 1985, effective January 1, 1986, 15 Pa.B. 2452; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999, 29 Pa.B. 2266; amended January 27, 2003, effective immediately, 33 Pa.B. 751; amended December 16, 2003, effective July 1, 2004, 34 Pa.B. 9; amended June 15, 2011, effective August 1, 2011, 41 Pa.B. 3526; amended April 29, 2016, effective immediately, 46 Pa.B. 2409; amended August 25, 2022, effective January 1, 2023, 52 Pa.B. 5792; amended February 18, 2026, effective immediately, 56 Pa.B. 1106. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (411426) and (417081).