RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.100.Submission of Proposed Orders or Judgments

Current through August 1, 2026 · Last verified September 12, 2026

In one sentenceUTCR 5.100 requires a party submitting a proposed order or judgment to serve it in advance or attach a stipulation from each attorney that no objection exists, and to include a dated, signed certificate below the space for the judicial signature explaining why it is ready.

Full Text of Rule 5.100

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

(1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this rule, any proposed judgment or proposed order submitted to the court for signature must be:
(a) Served on each attorney not less than three days prior to submission to the court, or
(b) Accompanied by a stipulation by each attorney that no objection exists as to the judgment or order, or
(c) Served on a self-represented party not less than seven days prior to submission to the court and be accompanied by notice of the time period to object.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this rule, any proposed judgment or order submitted to the court must include, following the space for judicial signature, a dated and signed certificate that describes:
(a) The manner and date of compliance with any applicable service requirement under this rule; and
(b) The reason that the submission is ready for judicial signature or otherwise states that any objection is ready for resolution, identifying the reason in substantially the following form:
“This proposed order or judgment is ready for judicial signature because: “1. [ ] Each party affected by this order or judgment has stipulated to the order or judgment, as shown by each party’s signature on the document being submitted. “2. [ ] Each party affected by this order or judgment has approved the order or judgment, as shown by each party’s signature on the document being submitted or by written confirmation of approval sent to me. “3. [ ] I have served a copy of this order or judgment on each party entitled to service, on date _____, and: “a. [ ] No objection has been served on me. “b. [ ] I received objections that I could not resolve with a party despite reasonable efforts to do so. I have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated which objections remain unresolved. “c. [ ] After conferring about objections, [role and name of objecting party] agreed to independently file any remaining objection. “4. [ ] Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by the following statute, rule, or otherwise: _____. “5. [ ] Each other party previously filed a waiver of appearance. “6. [ ] This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section as required by subsection (5) of this rule. “7. [ ] Other: _________________________________________.”
(3) The requirements of subsection (1) of this rule do not apply to:
(a) A proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present;
(b) A proposed order or judgment for which service is not required by statute, rule, or otherwise, provided that the submitting party sets out the specific legal basis for why service is not required;
(c) A proposed order or judgment in a proceeding in which all other parties previously filed waivers of appearance;
(d) A proposed judgment subject to UTCR 10.090;
(e) An uncontested probate or protective proceeding, or a petition for appointment of a temporary fiduciary under ORS 125.605(2);
(f) Matters certified to the court under ORS 25.515, ORS 25.550, ORS 25.552, and ORS 25.531, unless the proposed order or judgment is ready for judicial signature without hearing; and
(g) A proposed order allowing attorney resignation under UTCR 3.140.
(4) The requirements of subsection (2) of this rule do not apply to a proposed order or judgment presented and signed in open court with the parties present.
(5) Any proposed judgment containing an award of punitive damages shall be served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section, Oregon Department of Justice, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, OR 97301, not less than three days prior to submission to the court.
(6) The certificate required under subsection (2) may be combined with any certificate of service required by another statute or rule.
Pursuant to UTCR 1.130, computation of UTCR time requirements is subject to ORCP 10.
End

UTCR Reporter's Notes

Reporter’s Note (August 1, 2021): This rule does not apply in the following types of cases: criminal; proposed orders setting aside a record of arrest under ORS 137.225; contempt cases seeking punitive sanctions; juvenile under ORS chapter 419A, 419B, or 419C; or violations, parking violations, or small claims (see UTCR 1.010(3)). Nothing in this rule prohibits a court from adopting an SLR that applies this rule to matters under SLR chapters other than chapter 5.

Plain-English Summary

Most orders and judgments in a civil case reach the judge as a document another party drafted. UTCR 5.100 makes sure everyone sees the draft first. A proposed order or judgment must be served on each attorney not less than three days before it is submitted to the court, or arrive with a stipulation from each attorney that no objection exists. A self-represented party gets a longer runway: service not less than seven days before submission, together with notice of the time period to object.

The second half of the rule is the certificate. Following the space for the judicial signature, the submitting party adds a dated and signed certificate that describes the manner and date of compliance with any service requirement and gives the reason the submission is ready for signature. The rule supplies the wording as a set of boxes to check: every affected party stipulated, every affected party approved, the document was served and no objection came back, objections arrived that could not be resolved despite reasonable efforts, the objecting party agreed to file any remaining objection itself, service was not required, the other parties had already filed waivers of appearance, the punitive damages notice went out, or some other reason the submitting party spells out.

Not every submission runs that gauntlet. The advance service requirement does not apply to a proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present, one for which service is not required by statute, rule, or otherwise as long as the submitting party sets out the specific legal basis, a proceeding in which all other parties previously filed waivers of appearance, a proposed judgment subject to UTCR 10.090, an uncontested probate or protective proceeding or a petition for appointment of a temporary fiduciary, matters certified to the court under the statutes the rule lists unless they are ready for signature without a hearing, and a proposed order allowing attorney resignation under UTCR 3.140. The certificate requirement drops away only for an order or judgment presented and signed in open court with the parties present.

A judgment awarding punitive damages carries an added step: service on the Director of the Crime Victims' Assistance Section at the Oregon Department of Justice not less than three days before submission to the court. The certificate this rule requires may be combined with any certificate of service required by another statute or rule, so one document can carry both. Time under the rule is counted as UTCR 1.130 directs, which sends the computation to ORCP 10. The note published with the rule adds that it does not reach criminal cases, juvenile proceedings, violations, parking violations, small claims, contempt proceedings seeking punitive sanctions, or proposed orders setting aside a record of arrest.

Frequently Asked Questions

How far in advance do I have to serve a proposed judgment in Oregon?

Not less than three days before submission if you are serving an attorney, and not less than seven days before submission if you are serving a self-represented party, who also gets notice of the time period to object. The alternative is a stipulation from each attorney that no objection exists.

What is the certificate that goes below the signature line?

A dated, signed statement that follows the space for the judicial signature. It describes how and when you complied with any service requirement, and it identifies the reason the document is ready for signature using the checklist the rule sets out.

It may be combined with a certificate of service required by another statute or rule.

What do I do if the other side objects to my proposed order?

The rule gives you paths. If you received objections you could not resolve despite reasonable efforts, file a copy of the objections and indicate which ones remain unresolved. If the objecting party agreed after conferring to file any remaining objection independently, say so in the certificate and identify that party's role and name.

When can I submit a proposed order without serving it first?

When it is presented in open court with the parties present, when service is not required by statute or rule and you set out the specific legal basis, when all other parties previously filed waivers of appearance, for a proposed judgment subject to UTCR 10.090, in an uncontested probate or protective proceeding or on a petition for appointment of a temporary fiduciary, for matters certified to the court under the statutes the rule lists unless they are ready for signature without hearing, and for a proposed order allowing attorney resignation under UTCR 3.140.

Do I have to notify anyone before submitting a judgment with punitive damages?

Yes. Any proposed judgment containing an award of punitive damages must be served on the Director of the Crime Victims' Assistance Section at the Oregon Department of Justice not less than three days before it is submitted to the court, and the certificate has a box for saying you did it. UTCR 5.120 covers the separate notices tied to verdicts and judgments.

Source & verification. The rule text is reproduced verbatim from the official Oregon Uniform Trial Court Rules (UTCR 5.100). Prescribed by the Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court (UTCR 1.020). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified September 12, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: proposed judgment service oregonUTCR 5.100ready for judicial signature certificatesubmit proposed order oregonobjection to proposed order oregonthree day notice proposed judgment oregon