Rule 65.02.Continuance in Civil Actions Against Nonresidents.
Part I · Rule 65: Continuances · Last amended January 1, 1994 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65.02
Amendment History
Amended Jan. 19, 1973, eff. Sept. 1, 1973; Amended Sept. 28, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994.
Official Comment
This is substantially the same as prior Rule 65.02 but it has been broadened to cover all non-resident defendants.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 65.02 singles out one category of defendant for mandatory protection. Where Rule 65.01 leaves continuances generally to the court’s discretion on a showing of good cause, Rule 65.02 tells the court it “shall” grant whatever continuance is proper to give a nonresident defendant a reasonable opportunity to defend. The rule’s history notes that it was broadened at one point to reach every nonresident defendant, instead of a narrower category, reflecting the practical difficulty someone outside Missouri can face in responding to a Missouri lawsuit on the same timeline as a resident defendant.
The rule does not spell out how long that continuance has to be — only that it must be whatever is proper to give the nonresident defendant a real chance to mount a defense, leaving the specific length to the circumstances of the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who benefits from Rule 65.02?
A defendant who does not reside in Missouri.
Is this continuance discretionary or mandatory?
Mandatory. The rule says the court “shall” grant the continuance necessary to give the nonresident defendant a reasonable opportunity to defend.
How is this different from the general continuance rule?
Rule 65.01 sets a general, discretionary good-cause standard for continuances. Rule 65.02 specifically protects nonresident defendants and directs the court to grant whatever continuance is needed for a fair opportunity to defend.
Does this rule apply only to certain kinds of nonresident defendants?
No. The rule’s history notes it was broadened to cover all nonresident defendants, not a limited subset.
Does Rule 65.02 say how long the continuance must be?
No. It requires whatever continuance is proper to give the nonresident defendant a reasonable opportunity to defend, leaving the specific length to the circumstances of the case instead of fixing a set period.