Rule 310.1.Appellate Settlement Conference Program
Article III. Civil Appeals Rules · Part A. Appeals from the Circuit Court · Last amended 2016 · Last verified July 20, 2026
In one sentenceRule 310.1 authorizes appellate districts to run a mediation program that gives parties to eligible civil appeals a confidential chance to settle or narrow their case before briefing continues.
(a)Program Purpose and Goals. The purpose of the Appellate Settlement Conference
Program (Program) is to provide an alternative means for resolving certain civil appeals in the Illinois Appellate Court. The Program is intended to give parties to an appeal an opportunity and forum to discuss their case, simplify and/or limit the issues, negotiate settlement, and consider any matters that may aid in disposition of the appeal or resolution of the action or proceeding.
The Supreme Court may authorize appellate districts to undertake and conduct settlement conference programs. Such programs shall be provided at no additional court costs to the parties beyond the appellate filing fees as established by the Supreme Court.
(b)Applicability. Only civil appeals are eligible for assignment to the Program. However, appeals from judgments or orders entered in the following types of proceedings or actions are ineligible for inclusion in the Program: juvenile court proceedings, adoption proceedings, paternity proceedings, actions where the custody of or allocation of parental responsibilities for a minor is the sole issue, actions where the mental capacity of a party is at issue, contempt, petitions for extraordinary relief such as mandamus, petitions for writs of habeas corpus, actions for judicial review of decisions of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, and election contests. Also ineligible are appeals from a judgment or order imposing sanctions upon a litigant or attorney or incarcerating a party.
(1)Each appellate district conducting a settlement conference program shall adopt local rules for the conduct of such a program. Local rules are to be consistent with the provisions of this rule. Prior to the establishment of a settlement conference program, the presiding judge of the appellate district, or the chairman of the executive committee in the case of the First District, shall submit to the Supreme Court for its review and approval, through its Administrative Office, rules governing the operation of the district’s program.
(2)At a minimum, the rules adopted by an appellate district conducting a settlement conference program shall address:
(i)Actions eligible for inclusion in the program consistent with paragraph (b) of this rule;
(ii)Appointment, qualifications and compensation of the mediators;
(iii) Selection of cases for referral to a mediator consistent with paragraphs (e) and (f) of this rule;
(iv)Scheduling of the mediation conferences;
(v)Conduct of the conference and role of the appellate mediator;
(vi)Absence of a party at the conference and sanctions;
(vii) Termination and report of mediation conference;
(viii) Finalization of agreement;
(ix)Confidentiality;
(x)Mechanism for reporting to the Supreme Court on the settlement conference program.
(d)Administration. The Program shall be administered in each appellate district by a mediation committee consisting of two or more judges appointed under that district’s rules governing operation of the Program. The mediation committee may be assisted in its duties by a settlement administrator, who may be the clerk of court. The clerk may also be a member of the mediation committee.
(e)Case Selection. Cases may be selected for the Program as follows:
(1)Settlement Status Report. Any party may file with the clerk of the court in the district in which the case was filed a “Settlement Status Report.” Each appellate district may decide whether the filing of a “Settlement Status Report” shall be mandatory or voluntary. Notice of the filing of a “Settlement Status Report,” along with a copy of same, shall be served upon all parties in accordance with the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 11.
(2)Motions for Assignment to the Settlement Conference Program. On his or her own motion or on motion of any party, the presiding judge of the appellate district to which a case is assigned, or the presiding judge of the division to which a case is assigned in the case of the First District, may with the approval of the judge to whom the case has been assigned for dispositional purposes, if any, recommend to the mediation committee that a civil appeal be assigned to the Program. Upon receipt of the “Settlement Status Report” or recommendation from a presiding judge, the mediation committee shall evaluate the case to determine if the case is eligible for assignment to the Program. If no objection is filed, and the case is otherwise eligible, an order shall be entered which assigns the case to the Program, transfers it to a settlement docket, and stays the filing of the record and/or briefs pending further order of court.
(f)Objection to Assignment. Any party to an appeal may object to the case being assigned to the Program. Such objections shall be in accordance with the local rules of the appellate district in which the case was filed. Upon receipt of any such objection, the settlement administrator shall send a written notice to all parties and the appellate mediator, informing them that an objection has been received and that the case will be removed from the Program.
(1)If the settlement conference results in the settlement of the case and the parties agree to dismiss the appeal, an order dismissing the appeal shall be entered in the manner specified by the rules for that particular district.
(2)If the settlement conference does not result in settlement but the parties agree to narrow the issues on appeal, an order shall be prepared reciting the agreed terms. The order entered shall be binding upon the parties unless modified by subsequent order of the court. An order shall be entered removing the case from the Program, reassigning the case, and reestablishing the filing of the record and/or briefing schedule.
(h)Confidentiality. The settlement conference and all documents prepared by the parties, the appellate mediator, and the settlement administrator shall be confidential. No transcript or recording shall be made of any settlement conference and no mention of the settlement discussions shall be made in any brief filed with this court or in oral argument. Except for orders entered by the appellate court of the district in which the appeal was filed and written stipulations and agreements entered into by the parties, documents prepared by the parties and received by the appellate mediator or the settlement administrator as part of the Program shall not be filed of record with the clerk of the appellate court of that district and, upon dismissal of the case or its removal from the Program, whichever is first to occur, shall be destroyed by the settlement administrator.
(i)Sanctions. Failure of the parties or their authorized representatives to participate in a settlement conference in good faith, failure to attend a regularly scheduled settlement conference, or failure to comply with the rules applicable to settlement conferences adopted by the district in which the case was filed may subject a party to the imposition of sanctions under Supreme Court Rule 375.
(j)Statistical Reporting. The settlement administrator shall maintain statistics as to the number and type of cases which are (1) considered by the mediation committee for inclusion in the Program, (2) assigned to the Program, (3) removed from the program on the objection of a party, (4) removed from the Program without any settlement having been reached, (5) dismissed by agreement of the parties while assigned to the Program, and (6) removed from the Program after the entry of an order narrowing the issues on appeal. The settlement administrator shall report such statistics to the mediation committee in accordance with the local rules in his or her appellate district and annually to the Director of the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 310.1 sets up a structured alternative to full appellate briefing: a settlement conference program that appellate districts may adopt to help parties resolve or streamline civil appeals through mediation. Cases can enter the program because a party files a settlement status report, or because a presiding judge recommends it, and the mediation committee for the district decides whether the case qualifies.
Not every appeal is eligible. The rule excludes categories where mediation is a poor fit or the stakes make quick, adversarial resolution more appropriate — juvenile, adoption, and paternity proceedings, custody-only appeals, mental capacity cases, contempt, habeas corpus and mandamus petitions, workers' compensation review, election contests, and appeals involving sanctions or incarceration. Any party can also object to a case being assigned to the program, which removes it.
Confidentiality anchors the whole process: no recording or transcript of the conference is made, nothing discussed there can be cited in a brief or at argument, and the mediator's and administrator's working documents are destroyed once the case leaves the program. Each district adopts its own local rules covering scheduling, mediator qualifications, and reporting, subject to the Supreme Court's approval, and failing to participate in good faith can lead to sanctions under Rule 375.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kinds of appeals are excluded from the settlement conference program?
Juvenile court, adoption, and paternity proceedings, custody-only appeals, mental capacity cases, contempt, extraordinary-relief petitions like mandamus or habeas corpus, workers' compensation review, election contests, and appeals involving sanctions or incarceration.
How does a case get assigned to the program?
Through a settlement status report a party files, or a recommendation from the presiding judge, followed by the mediation committee's determination that the case is eligible.
Can I object if my appeal is assigned to the settlement conference program?
Yes. Any party can object under the local rules of the district where the case was filed, and the case is then removed from the program.
Is what happens during the settlement conference confidential?
Yes. No recording or transcript is made, the discussions can't be mentioned in briefs or at oral argument, and the mediator's working papers are destroyed once the case leaves the program.
What happens if a party doesn't participate in the settlement conference in good faith?
The rule allows sanctions under Rule 375 for failing to participate in good faith, failing to attend, or not following the district's local mediation rules.
Committee Comments
(March 8, 2016)
Special Supreme Court Committee on Child Custody Issues The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, Pub. Act 99-90 (eff. Jan. 1, 2016) (amending 750 ILCS 5/101 et seq.), has changed the terms “Custody,” “Visitation” (as to parents) and “Removal” to “Allocation of Parental Responsibilities,” “Parenting Time” and “Relocation.” These rules are being amended to reflect those changes. The rules utilize both “custody” and “allocation of parental responsibilities" in recognition that some legislative enactments covered by the rules utilize the term “custody” while the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act and the Illinois Parentage Act of 2015 utilize the term “allocation of parental responsibilities.” The Special Committee has attempted to adhere to the usage found in the applicable legislative enactments.
Amendment History
Adopted October 29, 2004, effective January 1, 2005; amended Mar. 8, 2016, eff. immediately.
Source & verification. Rule text, official Committee Comments, and
amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Illinois Supreme Court Rules,
promulgated by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Last verified July 20, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:appellate mediation Illinoissettlement conference program appealmediate an appealappellate ADRconfidential appellate mediation