§ 19-15-2.Protocol committee on child abuse; written protocol; training of members; written sexual abuse and exploitation protocol
Chapter 15. Child Abuse · Last amended 2016 · Last verified October 9, 2026
Full Text of § 19-15-2
Plain-English Summary
Every Georgia county must have a written protocol — a detailed plan — for investigating and prosecuting alleged child abuse. This section creates the committee that writes it. The chief superior court judge of the circuit establishes the protocol committee, appoints an interim chairperson to run the first meeting, and fills vacancies. After that, the members elect their own chairperson, who is responsible for making sure all agencies follow the written procedures. In a judicial circuit with more than one county, the committee decides whether to set up a committee for each county or one for the whole circuit.
For a single-county committee, eleven officials or agencies each designate a representative: the sheriff, the county DFCS office, the district attorney, the presiding juvenile court judge, the chief magistrate, the board of education, the county mental health organization, the county police chief (where there is a county police department), the police chief of the largest city, the county public health department, and the coroner or medical examiner. A circuit-wide committee draws the same kinds of members from each county in the circuit, except that it has a single district attorney and a single city police chief, from the circuit’s largest municipality. A local child advocacy center and a sexual assault center each send a representative if one exists, and the chief judge adds someone from a local citizen or advocacy group focused on child abuse awareness and prevention. If an agency won’t take part, the chief judge may order it to, and disobeying the order is punishable as contempt.
The protocol must spell out how abuse cases are investigated and prosecuted and how treatment is coordinated for the perpetrator, the family and the child. It must cover abuse in households with violence between spouses, co-parents, parents and children, stepparents, foster families or others who live or lived together. It must say when law enforcement officers shall and shall not go with DFCS investigators, weighing the child’s protection against the report’s confidentiality; set up joint work between police and investigators; describe local prevention measures; and include a written section on sexual abuse and sexual exploitation, including how sexual assault examinations are obtained and paid for. The protocol can’t be inconsistent with DFCS policies. Its purpose is coordination among agencies, less stress for the child, and more effective treatment, including counseling.
The committee doesn’t disband once the protocol is written. It meets at least semiannually to evaluate and update it, and files the updated protocol with DFCS and the Office of the Child Advocate for the Protection of Children by September 1 each year. By July 1 each year it issues a report on how well the past 12 months of investigations followed the protocol; the report goes to the county governing authority, the fall term grand jury, the Office of the Child Advocate and the chief superior court judge. Each member must be trained, by the Office of the Child Advocate, within 12 months after appointment. The sexual abuse section creates no rights anyone can enforce at law and doesn’t limit a prosecutor’s discretion.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a child abuse protocol committee in Georgia?
It is a multidisciplinary, multiagency committee that writes and updates the written protocol for investigating and prosecuting alleged child abuse in a county or circuit. The chief superior court judge of the circuit establishes it. Members include representatives of the sheriff, DFCS, the district attorney, the juvenile court, the chief magistrate, schools, mental health, police, public health and the coroner or medical examiner, plus child advocacy and sexual assault centers where they exist and a citizen or advocacy group.
Do police have to go with DFCS on a child abuse investigation in Georgia?
It depends on the local protocol. Each protocol committee must specify the circumstances under which law enforcement officers shall and shall not be required to accompany DFCS investigators on child abuse reports. In deciding, the committee must consider the need to protect the alleged victim and the need to preserve the confidentiality of the report. The committee must also establish joint work efforts between law enforcement and investigative agencies.
What happens if an agency refuses to take part in the protocol committee?
The chief superior court judge of the circuit may issue an order requiring the agency to participate, and failure to comply with that order is cause for punishment as for contempt of court. Under this section the order is discretionary. By contrast, § 19-15-3 says a judge shall issue such an order when an agency fails to take part in a child fatality review committee.
Can a parent attend a child abuse protocol committee meeting?
No. Under § 19-15-5, a protocol committee is closed to the public when it exercises its duties and isn’t subject to Georgia’s open meetings law. Its information and records are confidential under § 19-15-6, with limited exceptions. The committee does include one representative of a local citizen or advocacy group focused on child abuse awareness and prevention, designated by the chief superior court judge, but that seat isn’t open to the general public.
Can I sue if the county didn’t follow its child abuse protocol?
Nothing in this section creates a right to sue over it. For the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation part of the protocol, the section states that it creates no rights, substantive or procedural, that any party can enforce at law in a civil or criminal matter. For the rest of the protocol, the section is silent; it relies on the chairperson, who must make sure agencies follow the written procedures, and on the yearly compliance report. Whether other law offers a remedy is a question for a lawyer.
Amendment History
Laws 1987, p. 1065, § 1; Laws 1988, p. 474, § 1; Laws 1990, p. 1785, § 1; Laws 1991, p. 94, § 19; Laws 1993, p. 1695, § 2; Laws 1993, p. 1941, § 1; Laws 1994, p. 97, § 19; Laws 1998, p. 609, § 1; Laws 1999, p. 81, § 19; Laws 2001, p. 1158, § 1; Laws 2003, Act 105, § .5, eff. July 1, 2003; Laws 2004, Act 519, § 4, eff. July 1, 2004; Laws 2009, Act 102, § 2-2, eff. July 1, 2009; Laws 2010, Act 418, § 14, eff. July 1, 2010; Laws 2014, Act 476, § 2-4, eff. July 1, 2014; Laws 2016, Act 597, § 4, eff. July 1, 2016.
Formerly Code 1981, § 19-1-1; Code 1981, § 19-1-2.