RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.678.Findings in support of detention; factors to consider; reasonable efforts; active efforts; detention alternatives

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 12. Cases Petitioned Under Section 300 · Article 1. Initial Hearing · Last amended 2025 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.678 requires the court to release the child unless the statutory findings are made, and to decide either way whether reasonable or active efforts were made and whether services could prevent detention.

Full Text of Rule 5.678

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a) Findings in support of detention (§ 319; 42 U.S.C. § 672)
The court must order the child released from custody unless the court makes the findings specified in section 319(c), and where it is known, or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, the additional finding specified in section 319(d).
(b) Factor to consider
In determining whether to release or detain the child under (a), the court must consider the factors in section 319(f).
(c) Findings of the court—reasonable or active efforts (§ 319; 42 U.S.C. § 672)
(1) Whether the child is released or detained at the hearing, the court must determine whether reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal and must make one of the following findings:
(A) Reasonable efforts have been made; or
(B) Reasonable efforts have not been made.
(2) Where it is known or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, whether the child is released or detained at the hearing, the court must determine whether active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and whether those efforts have been successful. Those active efforts must be documented in detail in the record, and the court must make one of the following findings:
(A) Active efforts have been made and were successful; or
(B) Active efforts have been made and were not successful; or
(C) Active efforts have not been made; and
(D) The court orders the department to initiate or continue services in accordance with section 358.
(3) The court must also determine whether services are available that would prevent the need for further detention.
(4) The court must not order the child detained unless the court, after inquiry regarding available services, finds that there are no reasonable services that would prevent or eliminate the need to detain the child or that would permit the child to return home.
(5) If the court orders the child detained, the court must proceed under section 319(d)–(e).
(d) Orders of the court (§ 319; 42 U.S.C. § 672)
(1) If the court orders the child detained, the court must, in a written order or on the record, order that temporary care and custody of the child be vested with the county welfare department pending disposition or further order of the court and must make the other findings and orders specified in section 319(c)(2), (e), and (f)(3).
(2) When making the determination in section 319(c)(2)(B)(ii) that the placement complies with less disruptive alternatives, the court must also consider whether measures are available to alleviate disruption to the child and minimize the impact of removal and whether those measures have been utilized. In addition to considering the factors listed in section 319(c)(2)(A)(i) to (iv) related to the impact of removal and less disruptive alternatives, the court may consider factors that include, but are not limited to whether the current placement:
(A) Can accommodate the proposed visitation schedule.
(B) Will disrupt the child’s extracurricular activities or other services, including but not limited to medical, dental, mental health, and educational services.
(C) Will allow the child to observe their religious or cultural practices.
(D) Can accommodate the child’s special needs.
(e) Detention alternatives (§ 319)
The court may order the child detained as specified in section 319(f).
End

Plain-English Summary

The rule starts from release. The court must order the child released from custody unless it makes the findings the statute specifies — and, where it knows or has reason to know the child is an Indian child, the additional statutory finding. In deciding, it must consider the statutory factors.

The efforts finding is required whether or not the child is detained. The court must determine whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal and find either that they were or that they were not. For an Indian child it must also determine whether active efforts were made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family, and whether those efforts succeeded — documenting them in detail in the record and finding that active efforts were made and succeeded, were made and did not succeed, or were not made, and ordering the department to initiate or continue services.

Then a second inquiry: are there services available that would prevent the need for further detention? The court must not order detention unless, after asking, it finds there are no reasonable services that would prevent or eliminate the need to detain or that would let the child go home.

If the child is detained, temporary care and custody are vested with the county welfare department pending disposition, in a written order or on the record, along with the other statutory findings. In deciding whether the placement complies with less disruptive alternatives, the court must also consider whether measures exist to reduce the disruption of removal and whether they have been used — and may weigh whether the current placement can accommodate the visitation schedule, whether it disrupts extracurricular activities or medical, dental, mental health or educational services, whether it lets the child observe their religious or cultural practices, and whether it can meet the child’s special needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the default at the detention hearing?

Release. The court must order the child released from custody unless it makes the findings specified in section 319(c) — and, for an Indian child, the additional finding in section 319(d).

Does the court make an efforts finding even if the child goes home?

Yes. Whether the child is released or detained, the court must determine whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal, and find expressly that they were or were not.

What is the active efforts finding for an Indian child?

Whether active efforts were made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family, and whether they succeeded. The efforts must be documented in detail in the record, and the court orders the department to initiate or continue services.

Can the court detain if services would keep the child home?

No. The court must not order the child detained unless, after inquiring about available services, it finds there are no reasonable services that would prevent or eliminate the need to detain, or that would permit the child to return home.

What does the court weigh about the placement itself?

Beyond the statutory factors, whether the placement can accommodate the proposed visitation schedule, whether it will disrupt the child’s extracurricular activities or medical, dental, mental health and educational services, whether it allows the child to observe religious or cultural practices, and whether it can accommodate special needs.

Amendment History

Rule 5.678 amended effective January 1, 2025; repealed and adopted as rule 1446 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.678 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1999, July 1, 2002, January 1, 2016; and January 1, 2019.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2020; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2019.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2020; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2019.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2020; adopted as subd (d); previously amended and relettered effective July 1, 2002; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2019.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2025; adopted effective July 1, 2002; previously amended effective January1, 2019.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted effective January 1, 1999; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2007.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: reasonable efforts finding detention hearingactive efforts Indian child detentionless disruptive alternatives placement dependencyrelease from custody section 319 findings