Rule 5.676.Requirements for detention
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 12. Cases Petitioned Under Section 300 · Article 1. Initial Hearing · Last amended 2025 · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.676
Plain-English Summary
Detention is not the default. No child may be ordered detained unless the court finds a prima facie showing that the child is described by section 300, that continuance in the home of the parent, Indian custodian or guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare, and that at least one statutory ground for detention is present.
Where the court knows or has reason to know the child is an Indian child, there is a further finding: detention must be necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child — and the court must state the supporting facts on the record.
The court may rely solely on written police, probation or social worker reports or other documents. Those reports must carry the statutory information plus three things: what services have been provided and what services or safety plans could remove the need for custody; where a parent is in a certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent child to live with them, whether the child could be returned to that parent; and, where continued detention is recommended, information about any parent or guardian the child was not living with, and about any relative or nonrelative extended family member with whom the child might be detained instead.
For an Indian child the reports must go considerably further: the risk of imminent physical damage or harm and the evidence that removal remains necessary; the steps taken to notify the parents, Indian custodian and tribe; where the parents or Indian custodian are unknown, a detailed account of efforts to find them including contact with the Bureau of Indian Affairs regional director; the child’s residence and domicile; the tribe affiliated with any reservation or Alaska Native village involved; the tribal affiliation of the child and of the parents or Indian custodian; a specific and detailed account of the circumstances of the removal; where exclusive tribal jurisdiction may apply, the efforts made and being made to contact the tribe and transfer the case; the efforts to help the parents or Indian custodian so the child can safely go home; and the steps taken to consult and collaborate with the tribe, and what came of that.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must the court find before detaining a child?
A prima facie showing that the child is described by section 300; that continuance in the home of the parent, Indian custodian or guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare; and that one or more of the statutory grounds for detention is present.
Is there an extra requirement for an Indian child?
Yes. Where it is known or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, the court must also find that detention is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child, and must state the supporting facts on the record.
Can the court decide on paperwork alone?
Yes. In making the findings supporting detention the court may rely solely on written police, probation or social worker reports or other documents — but those reports must contain the information this rule and the statute require.
What must the report say about alternatives to detention?
It must describe the services provided and any available services or safety plans that would prevent or eliminate the need for custody, address whether a child could return to a parent in a certified substance abuse treatment facility, and — where continued detention is recommended — identify any non-custodial parent or guardian and any relative or nonrelative extended family member with whom the child could be detained.
Amendment History
Rule 5.676 amended effective January 1, 2025; repealed and adopted as rule 1445 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.676 effective January 1, 2007.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2025; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2020.) (Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2020.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2025; adopted as subd (b); previously amended effective July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2007; previously relettered effective January 1, 2020.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2025; adopted effective January 1, 2020.)