RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.676.Requirements for detention

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 12. Cases Petitioned Under Section 300 · Article 1. Initial Hearing · Last amended 2025 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.676 states what the court must find before ordering a child detained, the extra finding required for an Indian child, and what the reports relied on must contain.

Full Text of Rule 5.676

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

(a) Requirements for detention (§ 319)
No child may be ordered detained by the court unless the court finds that:
(1) A prima facie showing has been made that the child is described by section 300;
(2) Continuance in the home of the parent, Indian custodian, or guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare; and
(3) One or more of the grounds for detention in section 319(c)(1)(A)–(D) is present.
(b) Additional requirements for detention of Indian child
If it is known, or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, the child may not be ordered detained unless the court also finds that detention is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child. The court must state the facts supporting this finding on the record.
(c) Evidence required at detention hearing
In making the findings required to support an order of detention, the court may rely solely on written police reports, probation or social worker reports, or other documents. The reports relied on must include the required information in section 319(b) and:
(1) A description of the services that have been provided, including those under section 306, and of any available services or safety plans that would prevent or eliminate the need for the child to remain in custody;
(2) If a parent is enrolled in a certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent child to reside with the parent, information and a recommendation regarding whether the child can be returned to the custody of that parent; and
(3) If continued detention is recommended, information about any parent or guardian of the child with whom the child was not residing at the time the child was taken into custody and about any relative or nonrelative extended family member as defined under section 362.7 with whom the child may be detained.
(d) Additional evidence required at detention hearing for Indian child
If it is known, or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, the reports relied on must also include:
(1) A statement of the risk of imminent physical damage or harm to the Indian child and any evidence that the emergency removal or placement continues to be necessary to prevent the imminent physical damage or harm to the child;
(2) The steps taken to provide notice to the child’s parents, Indian custodian, and tribe about the hearing under section 224.3;
(3) If the child’s parents and Indian custodian are unknown, a detailed explanation of what efforts have been made to locate and contact them, including contact with the appropriate Bureau of Indian Affairs regional director;
(4) The residence and the domicile of the Indian child;
(5) If either the residence or the domicile of the Indian child is believed to be on a reservation or in an Alaska Native village, the name of the tribe affiliated with that reservation or village;
(6) The tribal affiliation of the child and of the parents or Indian custodian;
(7) A specific and detailed account of the circumstances that caused the Indian child to be taken into temporary custody;
(8) If the child is believed to reside or be domiciled on a reservation in which the tribe exercises exclusive jurisdiction over child custody matters, a statement of efforts that have been made and that are being made to contact the tribe and transfer the child to the tribe’s jurisdiction;
(9) A statement of the efforts that have been taken to assist the parents or Indian custodian so the Indian child may safely be returned to their custody; and
(10) The steps taken to consult and collaborate with the tribe and the outcome of that consultation and collaboration.
End

Plain-English Summary

Detention is not the default. No child may be ordered detained unless the court finds a prima facie showing that the child is described by section 300, that continuance in the home of the parent, Indian custodian or guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare, and that at least one statutory ground for detention is present.

Where the court knows or has reason to know the child is an Indian child, there is a further finding: detention must be necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child — and the court must state the supporting facts on the record.

The court may rely solely on written police, probation or social worker reports or other documents. Those reports must carry the statutory information plus three things: what services have been provided and what services or safety plans could remove the need for custody; where a parent is in a certified substance abuse treatment facility that allows a dependent child to live with them, whether the child could be returned to that parent; and, where continued detention is recommended, information about any parent or guardian the child was not living with, and about any relative or nonrelative extended family member with whom the child might be detained instead.

For an Indian child the reports must go considerably further: the risk of imminent physical damage or harm and the evidence that removal remains necessary; the steps taken to notify the parents, Indian custodian and tribe; where the parents or Indian custodian are unknown, a detailed account of efforts to find them including contact with the Bureau of Indian Affairs regional director; the child’s residence and domicile; the tribe affiliated with any reservation or Alaska Native village involved; the tribal affiliation of the child and of the parents or Indian custodian; a specific and detailed account of the circumstances of the removal; where exclusive tribal jurisdiction may apply, the efforts made and being made to contact the tribe and transfer the case; the efforts to help the parents or Indian custodian so the child can safely go home; and the steps taken to consult and collaborate with the tribe, and what came of that.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must the court find before detaining a child?

A prima facie showing that the child is described by section 300; that continuance in the home of the parent, Indian custodian or guardian is contrary to the child’s welfare; and that one or more of the statutory grounds for detention is present.

Is there an extra requirement for an Indian child?

Yes. Where it is known or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, the court must also find that detention is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child, and must state the supporting facts on the record.

Can the court decide on paperwork alone?

Yes. In making the findings supporting detention the court may rely solely on written police, probation or social worker reports or other documents — but those reports must contain the information this rule and the statute require.

What must the report say about alternatives to detention?

It must describe the services provided and any available services or safety plans that would prevent or eliminate the need for custody, address whether a child could return to a parent in a certified substance abuse treatment facility, and — where continued detention is recommended — identify any non-custodial parent or guardian and any relative or nonrelative extended family member with whom the child could be detained.

Amendment History

Rule 5.676 amended effective January 1, 2025; repealed and adopted as rule 1445 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.676 effective January 1, 2007.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2025; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2020.) (Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2020.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2025; adopted as subd (b); previously amended effective July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2007; previously relettered effective January 1, 2020.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2025; adopted effective January 1, 2020.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: requirements for detention section 319Indian child detention imminent physical damageprima facie showing section 300 detentiondetention report requirements dependency