RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.674.Conduct of hearing; admission, no contest, submission

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 12. Cases Petitioned Under Section 300 · Article 1. Initial Hearing · Last amended 2025 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.674 covers how the initial and detention hearings are conducted — admissions and no contest pleas, the findings that must be on the record, the right to cross-examine report preparers, and rehearings.

Full Text of Rule 5.674

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a) Admission, no contest, submission
(1) At the initial hearing, whether or not the child is detained, the parent or guardian may admit the allegations of the petition, plead no contest, or submit the jurisdictional determination to the court based on the information provided to the court and waive further jurisdictional hearing.
(2) If the court accepts an admission, a plea of no contest, or a submission from each parent and guardian with standing to participate as a party, the court must then proceed according to rules 5.682 and 5.686.
(b) Detention hearing; general conduct (§ 319; 42 U.S.C. § 600 et seq.)
(1) The court must read, consider, and reference the social worker’s report as described in section 319(b), any other reports submitted by the social worker, and any relevant evidence submitted by any party or counsel. All detention findings and orders must appear in the written orders of the court.
(2) The findings and orders that must be made on the record are:
(A) Continuance in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare;
(B) Temporary placement and care are vested with the social services agency;
(C) Reasonable efforts, or when it is known or there is reason to know the child is an Indian child, active efforts, have been made to prevent removal;
(D) The findings and orders required to be made on the record under section 319; and
(E) When it is known or there is reason to know the case involves an Indian child, that detention is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child, and there are no reasonable means by which the child can be protected if maintained in the physical custody of his or her parent or parents or Indian custodian.
(c) Detention hearing; rights of child, parent, Indian custodian, or guardian
(§§ 311, 319)
At the detention hearing, the child, the parent, Indian custodian, and the guardian have the right to assert the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to confront and cross-examine:
(1) The preparer of a police report, probation or social worker report, or other document submitted to the court; and
(2) Any person examined by the court under section 319. If the child, parent, Indian custodian, Indian child’s tribe, or guardian asserts the right to cross-examine preparers of documents submitted for court consideration, the court may not consider any such report or document unless the preparer is made available for cross-examination.
(d) No parent, Indian custodian, or Indian child’s tribe or guardian present and
not noticed (§ 321)
If the court orders the child detained at the detention hearing and no parent, Indian custodian, or Indian child’s tribe or guardian is present and no parent, Indian custodian, or Indian child’s tribe or guardian has received actual notice of the detention hearing, a parent, Indian custodian, or Indian child’s tribe or guardian may file an affidavit alleging the failure of notice and requesting a detention rehearing. The clerk must set the rehearing for a time within 24 hours of the filing of the affidavit, excluding noncourt days. At the rehearing the court must proceed under rules 5.670–5.678.
(e) Hearing for further evidence; prima facie case (§ 321)
If the court orders the child detained, and the child, a parent, an Indian custodian, an Indian child’s tribe, a guardian, or counsel requests that evidence of the prima facie case be presented, the court must set a prima facie hearing for a time within 3 court days to consider evidence of the prima facie case or set the matter for jurisdiction hearing within 10 court days. If at the hearing the petitioner fails to establish the prima facie case, the child must be released from custody.
End

Plain-English Summary

At the initial hearing, detained or not, a parent or guardian may admit the petition’s allegations, plead no contest, or submit the jurisdictional determination on the information before the court and waive a further jurisdiction hearing. Where the court accepts that from every parent and guardian with standing as a party, it moves straight on to the jurisdiction and disposition rules.

At the detention hearing the court must read, consider and reference the social worker’s report, any other reports, and any relevant evidence from any party — and all detention findings and orders must appear in the court’s written orders. Five things must be on the record: that continuance in the home is contrary to the child’s welfare; that temporary placement and care are vested with the agency; that reasonable efforts — or, for an Indian child, active efforts — were made to prevent removal; the findings the statute itself requires; and, for an Indian child, that detention is necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm and that no reasonable means exist to protect the child in the physical custody of a parent or Indian custodian.

The hearing is adversarial in a real sense. The child, parent, Indian custodian and guardian may assert the privilege against self-incrimination and may confront and cross-examine the preparer of any police, probation or social worker report or other document submitted, and anyone the court examines. If that right is asserted, the court may not consider the report or document unless its preparer is made available.

Two safety valves follow. If the child is detained and no parent, Indian custodian, tribe or guardian was present or had actual notice, any of them may file an affidavit alleging the failure of notice and asking for a rehearing — and the clerk must set it within 24 hours of filing, excluding noncourt days. And if the child is detained, any of them or counsel may ask to see the evidence behind the prima facie case: the court then sets a prima facie hearing within 3 court days or sets the jurisdiction hearing within 10. If the petitioner fails to establish the prima facie case, the child must be released.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a parent admit the petition at the initial hearing?

Yes. A parent or guardian may admit the allegations, plead no contest, or submit the jurisdictional determination on the information before the court and waive a further jurisdiction hearing. If the court accepts that from every parent and guardian with party standing, it proceeds under rules 5.682 and 5.686.

Can a parent cross-examine the social worker who wrote the report?

Yes. The child, parent, Indian custodian and guardian may confront and cross-examine the preparer of any report or document submitted to the court and anyone the court examines. If that right is asserted, the court may not consider the document unless its preparer is made available.

What if a parent was never notified of the detention hearing?

A parent, Indian custodian, tribe or guardian who was neither present nor actually noticed may file an affidavit alleging the failure of notice and requesting a rehearing. The clerk must set it within 24 hours of filing, excluding noncourt days.

Can the evidence behind detention be tested?

Yes. On request the court must set a prima facie hearing within 3 court days or set the jurisdiction hearing within 10 court days. If the petitioner fails to establish the prima facie case, the child must be released from custody.

Amendment History

Rule 5.674 amended effective January 1, 2025; repealed and adopted as rule 1444 effective January 1, 1998; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.674 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2016, January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2020.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 2002.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2025; adopted effective July 1, 2002; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2020; adopted as subd (c); previously amended and relettered as subd (d) effective July 1, 2002; previously amended and relettered as subd (c) effective January 1, 2017; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2020; previously adopted effective January 1, 2017.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2020; previously adopted effective January 1, 2017.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: detention hearing conduct California dependencyprima facie hearing juvenile detentiondetention rehearing failure of notice affidavitcross-examine social worker report detention