Rule 5.655.Program requirements for Court Appointed Special Advocate programs
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 11. Advocates for Parties · Last amended 2019 · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.655
Plain-English Summary
A CASA program recruits, screens, selects, trains, supervises and supports lay volunteers whom the court appoints to help work out what is best for children and nonminors in dependency and delinquency cases. It serves a county only if the presiding juvenile court judge designates it, and it must comply with this rule to receive Judicial Council funding.
Designation takes the form of a memorandum of understanding between the program and the court, and only those two may be parties to it. The memorandum must allow either side to end the relationship for convenience, and must say when and how the program gets access to the juvenile case file and any nonminor dependent court file. A program may serve several courts by signing a memorandum with each.
The program must be a nonprofit or operate under a public agency or nonprofit, with a written governance and evaluation plan: incorporation papers, a board, bylaws setting out the administrative relationship and delegations of authority, a stated mission with goals, a procedure for recruiting and evaluating an executive director, and an administrative manual covering personnel, record-keeping and data. Where the program sits under an umbrella organization, an active advisory council must be established to develop policy and budget, monitor operations and raise funds, while the umbrella’s board or management governs.
Local rules are part of the package. They must say when CASA reports go to the court, who receives a copy, who distributes it — and that it reaches those people at least two court days before the hearing it was written for.
Independence is protected structurally. No CASA program may operate under a probation department or a social services department. It may take money from them, but only under a memorandum saying the funds are for general operating expenses as the program decides and that the contributor will not oversee or monitor them, with a conflict-resolution procedure that keeps disputes from touching funding or the program’s independent evaluation, and with Judicial Council approval of the memorandum.
The financial requirements are specific: a written fiscal plan with an annual audit by a qualified professional, a budget with projections and a funding strategy, written accounting procedures, board control of fundraising, and insurance — general liability and nonowned automobile cover at $1 million each, automobile liability meeting state minimums where the program owns a vehicle, and workers’ compensation at $500,000. Staff and volunteers must report any criminal charges against themselves immediately, and a nonprofit must plan for what happens to property and confidential records if it dissolves.
Confidentiality runs on a written plan adopted by the presiding judge and the program director. Case information goes only to the court, the parties and their attorneys, and CASA staff. Volunteers remain mandated reporters of suspected abuse or serious neglect. The original case file stays in the CASA office with a custodian of records; copies leave only as needed; access requires the director’s or the presiding judge’s approval; and records must be locatable at any time. Volunteers’ personnel files are confidential too.
Screening is thorough. The written procedure requires an application capturing identifying data, education, training, experience, age and employment; notice that a formal security check including fingerprinting will be run through law enforcement agencies, with refusal a ground for rejection; and at least three completed references. Anyone convicted of, or facing current charges for, a felony or misdemeanour involving a sex offence, child abuse or child neglect must not be accepted, and the application form must say so. Recruitment must make all reasonable efforts to reach every racial, ethnic, linguistic and economic sector of the community, and no otherwise qualified adult may be discriminated against on the listed grounds. Volunteers who transport children need a valid licence, insurance meeting state minimums, permission from the guardian or custodial agency, and an annual driving record report.
Training is at least 30 hours of formal instruction covering the statutory topics, and final selection depends on completing it. Then comes an oath: before any assignment, the volunteer takes a court-administered oath describing the advocate’s duties and signs a written affirmation kept in their file. Volunteers serve at the court’s discretion as officers of the court, and every program must write down both their duties and the activities forbidden to them — taking a child home, giving legal advice or therapeutic counselling, giving money or expensive gifts, holding a related or conflicting position, and anything else the local court prohibits.
Oversight has its own written plan, approved by the presiding judge, with a grievance procedure that works in both directions and is handed out with the description of the volunteer’s role — to adults involved with the child’s case, to a nonminor on appointment, and to anyone raising a grievance. Grievance documentation goes in the personnel file. Training opportunities must be offered at least monthly, and volunteers must complete 12 hours of continuing education each year of service. A volunteer may resign or be removed from a case by the presiding judge or designee, may be involuntarily terminated by the program director, and may appeal that termination through the grievance procedure.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
These 1995 guidelines implement the requirements of section 100, which establishes a grant program administered by the Judicial Council to establish or expand CASA programs to assist children involved in juvenile dependency proceedings, including guardianships, adoptions, and actions to terminate parental rights to custody and control. CASA programs provide substantial benefits to children appearing in dependency proceedings and to the juvenile court having responsibility for these children. Child advocates improve the quality of judicial decision making by providing information to the court concerning the child. Advocates help identify needed services for the children they are assisting and provide a consistent friend and support person for children throughout the long and complex dependency process. The CASA concept was first implemented in Seattle in 1977. As of 1994, there were more than 30,000 volunteers working in more than 525 CASA programs in nearly every state. The programs recruit, screen, select, train, and supervise lay volunteers to become effective advocates in the juvenile court. Currently, numerous jurisdictions in California use some variation of the CASA concept. These programs have developed over the past several years under the supervision of local juvenile courts under sections 356.5 and 358. Each program is unique and was designed to respond to the specific needs of the local jurisdiction and community it serves. These guidelines provide a framework for ensuring the excellence of California CASA programs and volunteers. They are intended to be consistent with the guidelines established by the National CASA Association and to conform with the requirements of California law and procedure. The California CASA Association has assisted in developing these guidelines, which are meant to give the local bench, bar, child welfare professionals, children’s advocates, and other interested citizens full rein to adapt the CASA concept to the special needs and circumstances of local communities. Central to the intent of these guidelines is the effort to provide a vehicle for the presiding judge of the local juvenile court to exercise fully informed and effective oversight of the local CASA program and CASA volunteers. These guidelines are also intended to help CASA programs and juvenile courts develop local court rules. Nothing in these guidelines should limit or restrict the local juvenile court from developing and supporting multiple branches of a CASA program within the community to enable a county to offer comprehensive volunteer advocacy programs for children.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who authorizes a CASA program to serve a county?
The presiding judge of the juvenile court, by designating the program — a designation that takes the form of a memorandum of understanding between the program and the court, to which they must be the only parties.
Can a CASA program be run by probation or social services?
No. No CASA program may function under the auspices of a probation department or department of social services. It may accept funds from them only under a memorandum restricting the money to general operating expenses, barring oversight of the funds, and approved by Judicial Council staff.
How much training does a CASA volunteer need?
At least 30 hours of formal initial instruction covering the statutory topics, then a minimum of 12 hours of continuing education in each year of service, with training opportunities offered at least monthly.
What disqualifies someone from being a CASA volunteer?
Conviction of, or current pending charges for, a felony or misdemeanor involving a sex offense, child abuse or child neglect. Refusing to consent to the formal security check, which includes fingerprinting, is also grounds for rejection.
What are CASA volunteers forbidden to do?
Take a child or nonminor to their own home, give legal advice or therapeutic counseling, give money or expensive gifts to the child or family, hold a related or conflicting position, or anything else the local juvenile court prohibits.
When must a CASA report reach the parties?
At least two court days before the hearing it was prepared for. The local rule must say when reports are submitted, who receives a copy, and who distributes them.
Amendment History
Rule 5.655 amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted as rule 1424 effective July 1, 1994; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.655 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1995, January 1, 2000, January 1, 2001, January 1, 2005, January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2016.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted effective January 1, 2005.) (Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2019.) (Subd (c) adopted effective January 1, 2019.) (Subd (d) adopted effective January 1, 2019.) (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (b); previously amended and relettered as subd(c) effective January 1, 2005; previously amended effective January 1, 1995, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2010.) (Subd (f) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (c); previously amended and relettered as subd (d) effective January 1, 2005; previously amended effective January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (g) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2005; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (h) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (e); previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2005; previously amended effective January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (i) relettered and amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (g) effective January 1, 2005.) (Subd (j) relettered and amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (f); previously amended effective January 1, 1995; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2005.) (Subd (k) relettered and amended effective January 1, 2018; adopted as subd (g); previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2005; previously amended effective January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (h); previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2005; previously amended effective January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2007.)