Rule 5.660.Attorneys for parties (§§ 317, 317.5, 317.6, 353, 366.26, 16010.6)
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 11. Advocates for Parties · Last amended 2015 · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.660
Plain-English Summary
Every county’s superior court must have local rules on representation in dependency proceedings, developed in consultation with the State Bar, the offices that supply appointed counsel, welfare departments, child advocates, current or recent foster youth, and others the court selects. Those rules cover representation of children, timelines for contested matters, screening, training and appointment of attorneys, minimum standards of experience and education including substance abuse and domestic violence, caseload determination, complaint handling, informing the court of interests needing further action, and appointing a CAPTA guardian ad litem where a criminal prosecution arises from the abuse or neglect.
The court must appoint counsel for an unrepresented child in a section 300 case unless it finds the child would not benefit — and that finding is hard to make. All three things must be true: the child understands the proceedings, can communicate and advocate effectively with the court, counsel, other parties including social workers and other professionals, and would gain no benefit from representation. The court must make a record finding on each of the three and give its reasons — and must then appoint a CASA volunteer as the child’s CAPTA guardian ad litem.
Siblings may share one attorney. The attorney must decline, and the court must appoint separate counsel, where an actual conflict exists at the outset or the circumstances make one reasonably likely. Several things do not by themselves show a conflict: different ages, different parents, a purely theoretical conflict, differing adoptability, or different permanent plans. The duty is continuing — the attorney must keep assessing each sibling’s interests. Once representation is under way, the same list applies with two additions: conflicting wishes, or different and even contradictory accounts, do not amount to a conflict where the issues are not material to the case. A mere likelihood of a future conflict does not require withdrawal.
Where the attorney believes an actual conflict existed or has developed, they must protect the siblings’ interests — notifying the court and asking to withdraw — and the court must relieve them if it agrees. Continuing for some siblings afterwards is possible only on three conditions: successful withdrawal from all conflicting siblings, no confidential information exchanged with any of them, and no other prejudice.
Competent counsel is defined, not assumed: a State Bar member in good standing who has trained in dependency law and shows forensic skill, command of the statutory scheme and its purposes, and knowledge of the writ procedure. Appointment requires eight hours of dependency training or sufficient recent demonstrated experience, and the training must cover dependency law and cases, child development, abuse and neglect, substance abuse, domestic violence, reunification and preservation and reasonable efforts — and, for a child’s attorney, cultural competency and best practices for LGBT youth in out-of-home placement. Eight hours of continuing education is required every three years, and the court may require evidence of competency.
The standards of representation are practical. Attorneys or their agents are expected to meet regularly with clients — children included, whatever their age or verbal ability — contact social workers and other professionals, work to resolve disputes without a contested hearing, and meet the deadlines. A child’s attorney must have enough contact to maintain a real attorney-client relationship, but is not required to take on a social worker’s job or provide services unrelated to the legal representation. Contact information goes to the caregiver within 10 days of receiving their details, and to a child of 10 or older within the same period; younger children may be given it. Once a year the attorney must send contact details to the educational liaison of each local educational agency serving their foster care clients, where the state list is online. Caseloads must stay low enough to do all of this.
Courts must run a complaint process, tell every party how to use it, and act if an appointed attorney has behaved improperly. And where the court appoints a CASA volunteer as CAPTA guardian ad litem instead of an attorney, that volunteer is limited to 10 cases — siblings may count as one, absent a conflict — must not take on an attorney’s responsibilities, and may be appointed alongside an attorney, which courts are encouraged to do as often as possible.
Finally, anyone may tell the court about an interest or right of the child that needs protecting in another forum. If the child’s attorney or CAPTA guardian ad litem learns of one, they must notify the court immediately and ask for instructions. Where action is needed, the court must appoint an attorney if the child has none, and may refer the matter for investigation with a report back, direct the attorney to act, appoint a guardian ad litem, or do anything else that protects the child’s interests.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
The court should initially appoint a single attorney to represent all siblings in a dependency matter unless there is an actual conflict of interest or a reasonable likelihood that an actual conflict of interest will arise. (In re Celine R. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 45, 58.) After the initial appointment, the court should relieve an attorney from representation of multiple siblings only if an actual conflict of interest arises. (Ibid.) Attorneys have a duty to use their best judgment in analyzing whether, under the particular facts of the case, it is necessary to decline appointment or request withdrawal from appointment due to a purported conflict of interest. Nothing in this rule is intended to extend the permissible scope of any judicial inquiry into an attorney’s reasons for declining to represent one or more siblings or requesting to withdraw from representation of one or more siblings, due to an actual or reasonably likely conflict of interest. (See State Bar Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 3-310(C).) While the court has the duty and authority to inquire as to the general nature of an asserted conflict of interest, it cannot require an attorney to disclose any privileged communication, even if such information forms the basis of the alleged conflict. (In re James S. (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 930, 934; Aceves v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 584, 592–593.)
Frequently Asked Questions
Does every child in a dependency case get a lawyer?
The court must appoint counsel unless it finds the child would not benefit — which requires findings that the child understands the proceedings, can communicate and advocate effectively with everyone involved, and would gain no benefit. The court must state each finding and its reasons on the record, and must then appoint a CASA volunteer as CAPTA guardian ad litem.
Can one attorney represent several siblings?
Yes, unless an actual conflict of interest exists at the outset or the circumstances make one reasonably likely. Different ages, different parents, a purely theoretical conflict, differing adoptability, and different permanent plans do not by themselves establish a conflict.
What happens when a conflict does arise between siblings?
The attorney must act to protect the siblings’ interests — notify the court and request to withdraw — and the court must relieve them if it finds an actual conflict. They may continue for non-conflicting siblings only after withdrawing from all conflicting ones, having exchanged no confidential information with them, and where no other prejudice results.
What counts as competent counsel?
A State Bar member in good standing who has trained in juvenile dependency law and shows adequate forensic skills, knowledge of the statutory scheme and its purposes, the relevant statutes, rules and cases, and the extraordinary writ procedure.
How much training is required?
Eight hours of dependency training or education before appointment — or sufficient recent experience demonstrating competence — plus at least eight hours of continuing education every three years.
How many cases can a CASA volunteer serving as CAPTA guardian ad litem carry?
Ten. A case may include siblings, absent a conflict. The volunteer must not assume the responsibilities of an attorney for the child.
Amendment History
Rule 5.660 amended effective January 1, 2015; adopted as rule 1438 effective January 1, 1996; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1999, July 1, 2001, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2005, January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2014.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 2001, and January 1, 2003.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted effective July 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2003.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted effective January 1, 2006.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2015; adopted as subd (b); amended and relettered as subd (c) effective July 1, 2001; previously relettered effective January 1, 2006; previously amended effective July 1, 1999, January 1, 2005, January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2014.) (Subd (e) relettered effective January 1, 2006; adopted as subd (c); previously amended and relettered as subd (d) effective July 1, 2001.) (Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously relettered effective January 1, 2006.) (Subd (g) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective July 1, 2001; amended effective January 1, 2003; previously relettered effective January 1, 2006.)