Rule 268.Motion for Instructed Verdict
Last verified June 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 268
Plain-English Summary
Rule 268 is a single sentence with real bite: a motion for a directed verdict must state the specific grounds for it. A general motion that asserts only that there is no evidence, without identifying the specific deficiency, does not satisfy the rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a directed verdict motion have to state specific grounds in Texas?
Yes. Rule 268 requires a motion for an instructed (directed) verdict to state the specific grounds for it.
What happens if a directed verdict motion only says the evidence is insufficient?
It falls short. Rule 268 requires the motion to state its specific grounds, so a general assertion that the evidence does not support the claim, without identifying the actual defect, does not satisfy the rule.
Why does Rule 268 require specific grounds instead of a general motion?
To pin down what is being challenged. The specific-grounds requirement forces the movant to identify the precise defect in the evidence, rather than leaving the court and the other side to guess at a general claim that the case is insufficient.