RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 90.005.Prohibited Basis for Diagnosis

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 90. Claims Involving Asbestos and Silica · Subchapter A. General Provisions · Last amended 2005 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 90.005 forbids a physician from basing a diagnosis on reports from testing conducted in violation of law, regulation, licensing requirement, or medical code of practice.

Full Text of § 90.005

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)For purposes of this chapter, a physician may not, as the basis for a diagnosis, rely on the reports or opinions of any doctor, clinic, laboratory, or testing company that performed an examination, test, or screening of the exposed person's medical condition that was conducted in violation of any law, regulation, licensing requirement, or medical code of practice of the state in which the examination, test, or screening was conducted.
(b)If a physician relies on any information in violation of Subsection (a), the physician's opinion or report does not comply with the requirements of this chapter.
End

Plain-English Summary

A short provision aimed directly at the practice that produced this chapter.

A physician may not, as the basis for a diagnosis, rely on the reports or opinions of any doctor, clinic, laboratory, or testing company that performed an examination, test, or screening of the exposed person that was conducted in violation of any law, regulation, licensing requirement, or medical code of practice.

Subsection (b) supplies the consequence: a physician who relies on such information produces an opinion or report that does not comply with the requirements of this chapter — and a non-compliant report is subject to dismissal under the motion provision.

The provision responds to mass screening operations. Large numbers of claims were generated by screening companies that examined workers in bulk, produced x-ray readings and diagnoses at volume, and supplied them to physicians who signed reports without independent examination.

The four grounds are broad — law, regulation, licensing requirement, or medical code of practice. The last reaches conduct that was not illegal but departed from professional standards.

The section works alongside the reporting requirements, which independently demand that the physician or a professional under their direct supervision performed the examination and took the histories. Together they require the diagnosis to rest on the physician's own work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a physician rely on outside screening results?

Not as the basis for a diagnosis, where the examination, test, or screening was conducted in violation of any law, regulation, licensing requirement, or medical code of practice.

What happens if they do?

The physician's opinion or report does not comply with the chapter, which exposes the claim to dismissal.

Why are mass screening diagnoses prohibited?

It responds to mass screening operations that generated diagnoses at volume for physicians who signed reports without independent examination.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 97 (S.B. 15), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source