§ 90.007.Motion to Dismiss in Action Filed on or After September 1, 2005
Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 90. Claims Involving Asbestos and Silica · Subchapter A. General Provisions · Last amended 2013 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 90.007
Plain-English Summary
The enforcement mechanism, and it is less severe than its counterpart in the medical liability chapter.
In an action filed on or after September 1, 2005, if a claimant fails to timely serve a report or serves one that does not comply with the reporting requirements, the defendant may file a motion to dismiss the asbestos- or silica-related claims.
Subsection (b) gives the claimant a cure. A response may be filed on or before the 15th day after the motion is served, and a report may be filed, amended, or supplemented within the time for responding.
That is a genuine second chance, and it applies to an absent report as well as a deficient one — unlike the medical liability chapter, where an absent report cannot be cured at all.
Subsection (c): if the court finds the motion meritorious it shall grant it by written order and dismiss the claims against that defendant. The dismissal is without prejudice to refiling.
Without prejudice is the crucial difference. A claimant dismissed here may sue again when the disease progresses to meet the criteria, and the limitations chapter contains a provision preserving that right for asbestos and silica claims.
Subsection (d) stays everything while the motion is heard and determined. Subsection (e) lets the court shorten or extend any of these deadlines on a showing of good cause.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if I do not serve an asbestos report?
The defendant may move to dismiss, but you may file, amend, or supplement the report within the 15 days allowed for responding to the motion.
Is dismissal permanent?
No. A dismissal under this section is without prejudice to filing a subsequent action.
Does the case continue while the motion is pending?
No. All further proceedings are stayed until the motion is heard and determined.
How does this compare to the medical liability expert report?
It is less severe. There, an absent report cannot be cured and dismissal is with prejudice with a mandatory fee award. Here the report can be supplied late and dismissal is without prejudice.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 97 (S.B. 15), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.
- Amended by:
- Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 146 (H.B. 1325), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.
- Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 146 (H.B. 1325), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.