RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 90.003.Reports Required for Claims Involving Asbestos- Related Injury

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 90. Claims Involving Asbestos and Silica · Subchapter A. General Provisions · Last amended 2005 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 90.003 sets the report required for an asbestos claim — a short route for mesothelioma and other cancer, and a demanding six-part route for non-malignant claims requiring x-ray, impairment, and a ten-year latency.

Full Text of § 90.003

Text sizeJump to: (a) (a) (b) (c) (b) (c) (d)

(a)A claimant asserting an asbestos-related injury must serve on each defendant the following information:
(1)a report by a physician who is board certified in pulmonary medicine, occupational medicine, internal medicine, oncology, or pathology and whose license and certification were not on inactive status at the time the report was made stating that:
(A)the exposed person has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma or other malignant asbestos-related cancer; and
(B)to a reasonable degree of medical probability, exposure to asbestos was a cause of the diagnosed mesothelioma or other cancer in the exposed person; or
(2)a report by a physician who is board certified in pulmonary medicine, internal medicine, or occupational medicine and whose license and certification were not on inactive status at the time the report was made that:
(A)verifies that the physician or a medical professional employed by and under the direct supervision and control of the physician:
(i)performed a physical examination of the exposed person, or if the exposed person is deceased, reviewed available records relating to the exposed person's medical condition;
(ii)took a detailed occupational and exposure history from the exposed person or, if the exposed person is deceased, from a person knowledgeable about the alleged exposure or exposures that form the basis of the action; and
(iii)took a detailed medical and smoking history that includes a thorough review of the exposed person's past and present medical problems and their most probable cause;
(B)sets out the details of the exposed person's occupational, exposure, medical, and smoking history and verifies that at least 10 years have elapsed between the exposed person's first exposure to asbestos and the date of diagnosis;
(C)verifies that the exposed person has:
(i)a quality 1 or 2 chest x-ray that has been read by a certified B-reader according to the ILO system of classification as showing:
(a)bilateral small irregular opacities (s, t, or u) with a profusion grading of 1/1 or higher, for an action filed on or after May 1, 2005;
(b)bilateral small irregular opacities (s, t, or u) with a profusion grading of 1/0 or higher, for an action filed before May 1, 2005; or
(c)bilateral diffuse pleural thickening graded b2 or higher including blunting of the costophrenic angle; or
(ii)pathological asbestosis graded 1(B) or higher under the criteria published in "Asbestos-Associated Diseases," 106 Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 11, Appendix 3 (October 8, 1982);
(D)verifies that the exposed person has asbestos- related pulmonary impairment as demonstrated by pulmonary function testing showing:
(i)forced vital capacity below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio (using actual values) at or above the lower limit of normal or at or above 65 percent; or
(ii)total lung capacity, by plethysmography or timed gas dilution, below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted;
(E)verifies that the physician has concluded that the exposed person's medical findings and impairment were not more probably the result of causes other than asbestos exposure revealed by the exposed person's occupational, exposure, medical, and smoking history; and
(F)is accompanied by copies of all ILO classifications, pulmonary function tests, including printouts of all data, flow volume loops, and other information demonstrating compliance with the equipment, quality, interpretation, and reporting standards set out in this chapter, lung volume tests, diagnostic imaging of the chest, pathology reports, or other testing reviewed by the physician in reaching the physician's conclusions.
(b)The detailed occupational and exposure history required by Subsection (a)(2)(A)(ii) must describe:
(1)the exposed person's principal employments and state whether the exposed person was exposed to airborne contaminants, including asbestos fibers and other dusts that can cause pulmonary impairment; and
(2)the nature, duration, and frequency of the exposed person's exposure to airborne contaminants, including asbestos fibers and other dusts that can cause pulmonary impairment.
(c)If a claimant's pulmonary function test results do not meet the requirements of Subsection (a)(2)(D)(i) or (ii), the claimant may serve on each defendant a report by a physician who is board certified in pulmonary medicine, internal medicine, or occupational medicine and whose license and certification were not on inactive status at the time the report was made that:
(1)verifies that the physician has a physician-patient relationship with the exposed person;
(2)verifies that the exposed person has a quality 1 or 2 chest x-ray that has been read by a certified B-reader according to the ILO system of classification as showing bilateral small irregular opacities (s, t, or u) with a profusion grading of 2/1 or higher;
(3)verifies that the exposed person has restrictive impairment from asbestosis and includes the specific pulmonary function test findings on which the physician relies to establish that the exposed person has restrictive impairment;
(4)verifies that the physician has concluded that the exposed person's medical findings and impairment were not more probably the result of causes other than asbestos exposure revealed by the exposed person's occupational, exposure, medical, and smoking history; and
(5)is accompanied by copies of all ILO classifications, pulmonary function tests, including printouts of all data, flow volume loops, and other information demonstrating compliance with the equipment, quality, interpretation, and reporting standards set out in this chapter, lung volume tests, diagnostic imaging of the chest, pathology reports, or other testing reviewed by the physician in reaching the physician's conclusions.
(d)If a claimant's radiologic findings do not meet the requirements of Subsection (a)(2)(C)(i), the claimant may serve on each defendant a report by a physician who is board certified in pulmonary medicine, internal medicine, or occupational medicine and whose license and certification were not on inactive status at the time the report was made that:
(1)verifies that the physician has a physician-patient relationship with the exposed person;
(2)verifies that the exposed person has asbestos-related pulmonary impairment as demonstrated by pulmonary function testing showing:
(A)either:
(i)forced vital capacity below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted and total lung capacity, by plethysmography, below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted; or
(ii)forced vital capacity below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio (using actual values) at or above the lower limit of normal or at or above 65 percent; and
(B)diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted;
(3)verifies that the exposed person has a computed tomography scan or high-resolution computed tomography scan showing either bilateral pleural disease or bilateral parenchymal disease consistent with asbestos exposure;
(4)verifies that the physician has concluded that the exposed person's medical findings and impairment were not more probably the result of causes other than asbestos exposure as revealed by the exposed person's occupational, exposure, medical, and smoking history; and
(5)is accompanied by copies of all computed tomography scans, ILO classifications, pulmonary function tests, including printouts of all data, flow volume loops, and other information demonstrating compliance with the equipment, quality, interpretation, and reporting standards set out in this chapter, lung volume tests, diagnostic imaging of the chest, pathology reports, or other testing reviewed by the physician in reaching the physician's conclusions.
End

Plain-English Summary

The medical criteria for asbestos claims, and the two routes differ sharply in weight.

The cancer route is short. A physician board certified in pulmonary medicine, occupational medicine, internal medicine, oncology, or pathology states that the exposed person has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma or other malignant asbestos-related cancer and that to a reasonable degree of medical probability, exposure to asbestos was a cause.

The non-malignant route requires six things, from a physician board certified in pulmonary, internal, or occupational medicine.

(A) verification that the physician or a professional under their direct supervision performed a physical examination (or reviewed records if the person is deceased), took a detailed occupational and exposure history, and took a detailed medical and smoking history. (B) the details of those histories, and verification that at least 10 years elapsed between first exposure and diagnosis.

(C) radiological or pathological findings: a quality 1 or 2 chest x-ray read by a certified B-reader showing bilateral small irregular opacities (s, t, or u) at profusion 1/1 or higher for actions filed on or after May 1, 2005, or bilateral diffuse pleural thickening graded b2 or higher including blunting of the costophrenic angle; or pathological asbestosis graded 1(B) or higher.

(D) impairment shown by pulmonary function testing: FVC below the lower limit of normal or below 80 percent of predicted with an FEV1/FVC ratio at or above the lower limit or 65 percent, or total lung capacity below the lower limit or 80 percent of predicted.

(E) a conclusion that the findings were not more probably the result of causes other than asbestos exposure, and (F) copies of all classifications, test printouts, flow volume loops, and supporting data.

Subsections (c) and (d) supply alternatives where the pulmonary function results or the radiologic findings fall short — each requiring a physician-patient relationship and higher findings elsewhere, such as profusion 2/1 or a CT scan showing bilateral disease.

Frequently Asked Questions

What report is required for a Texas asbestos claim?

For mesothelioma or other malignant asbestos-related cancer, a board certified physician's diagnosis and a statement that asbestos exposure was a cause to a reasonable degree of medical probability. For non-malignant claims, a six-part report including examination, histories, a ten-year latency, specified radiological findings, and pulmonary impairment.

What is the latency requirement?

At least 10 years must have elapsed between the exposed person's first exposure to asbestos and the date of diagnosis.

What x-ray findings qualify?

A quality 1 or 2 chest x-ray read by a certified B-reader showing bilateral small irregular opacities at profusion 1/1 or higher for actions filed on or after May 1, 2005, or bilateral diffuse pleural thickening graded b2 or higher including blunting of the costophrenic angle — or pathological asbestosis graded 1(B) or higher.

What if the test results fall just short?

Subsections (c) and (d) provide alternative reports requiring a physician-patient relationship and higher findings elsewhere, such as profusion 2/1 or a CT scan showing bilateral disease.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 97 (S.B. 15), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source