§ 75.002.Liability Limited
Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 75. Limitation of Landowners' Liability · Last amended 2007 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 75.002
Plain-English Summary
The core of the recreational use statute, and it works by lowering a duty rather than granting an immunity.
On agricultural land, an owner, lessee, or occupant does not owe a duty of care to a trespasser and is not liable for any injury to a trespasser except for wilful or wanton acts or gross negligence.
Where permission is given for recreation — on agricultural land under subsection (b), on other real property under subsection (c) — the owner by giving permission does not: assure that the premises are safe; owe a greater degree of care than is owed to a trespasser; or assume responsibility for any injury caused by an act of the person permitted to enter.
The middle clause is the operative one. A person invited onto land for recreation would ordinarily be an invitee or licensee, owed a real duty. This reduces that to the trespasser standard — liability only for wilful, wanton, or grossly negligent conduct.
Subsection (d) preserves the floor: the limits do not apply to an owner who has been grossly negligent or has acted with malicious intent or in bad faith.
Subsection (f) covers governmental premises: a person who enters premises a governmental unit owns, operates, or maintains and engages in recreation is owed no greater degree of care than a trespasser — which is why the Tort Claims Act yields to this chapter.
Subsection (e) adds four activities on governmental premises only: hockey and in-line hockey; skating, in-line skating, roller-skating, skateboarding, and roller-blading; soap box derby use; and paintball use. Subsection (g) requires a clearly readable warning sign in a visible location where those activities are conducted.
Subsection (h) is unrelated to recreation and sits here for historical reasons: liability for trespass by migration or transport of an air contaminant, other than odor, requires a showing of actual and substantial damages.
Frequently Asked Questions
What duty is owed to someone using my land for recreation in Texas?
No greater than the duty owed a trespasser — liability only for wilful or wanton acts or gross negligence.
Does giving permission increase my duty?
No. By giving permission you do not assure the premises are safe, owe a greater degree of care than to a trespasser, or assume responsibility for the entrant's own acts.
Does it apply to public parks?
Yes. A person entering premises a governmental unit owns, operates, or maintains and engaging in recreation is owed no greater care than a trespasser.
When is a warning sign required?
On governmental premises where hockey, skating, skateboarding, soap box derby, or paintball activities are conducted.
Is there any conduct the statute does not protect?
Yes. It does not limit liability for gross negligence, malicious intent, or bad faith.
Amendment History
- Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 56, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 734, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 204, Sec. 21.01, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 739, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
- Amended by:
- Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 116 (S.B. 1224), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.
- Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 932 (H.B. 616), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.
- Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 227 (H.B. 1560), Sec. 1, eff. May 25, 2007.
- Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 659 (H.B. 1183), Sec. 2, eff. June 15, 2007.