RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 75.007.Trespassers

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 75. Limitation of Landowners' Liability · Last amended 2017 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 75.007 codifies the trespasser duty as refraining from wilful, wanton, or grossly negligent injury, with a five-element exception for a child injured by a highly dangerous artificial condition.

Full Text of § 75.007

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a)In this section, "trespasser" means a person who enters the land of another without any legal right, express or implied.
(b)An owner, lessee, or occupant of land does not owe a duty of care to a trespasser on the land and is not liable for any injury to a trespasser on the land, except that an owner, lessee, or occupant owes a duty to refrain from injuring a trespasser wilfully, wantonly, or through gross negligence.
(c)Notwithstanding Subsection (b), an owner, lessee, or occupant of land may be liable for injury to a child caused by a highly dangerous artificial condition on the land if:
(1)the place where the artificial condition exists is one upon which the owner, lessee, or occupant knew or reasonably should have known that children were likely to trespass;
(2)the artificial condition is one that the owner, lessee, or occupant knew or reasonably should have known existed, and that the owner, lessee, or occupant realized or should have realized involved an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to such children;
(3)the injured child, because of the child's youth, did not discover the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with the condition or coming within the area made dangerous by the condition;
(4)the utility to the owner, lessee, or occupant of maintaining the artificial condition and the burden of eliminating the danger were slight as compared with the risk to the child involved; and
(5)the owner, lessee, or occupant failed to exercise reasonable care to eliminate the danger or otherwise protect the child.
(d)An owner, lessee, or occupant of land whose actions are justified under Subchapter C or D, Chapter 9, Penal Code, is not liable to a trespasser for damages arising from those actions.
(e)This section does not affect Section 75.001, 75.002, 75.003, or 75.004 or create or increase the liability of any person.
End

Plain-English Summary

The trespasser duty, codified in 2011, together with the one exception Texas recognises.

"Trespasser" means a person who enters the land of another without any legal right, express or implied.

An owner, lessee, or occupant does not owe a duty of care to a trespasser and is not liable for any injury, except a duty to refrain from injuring a trespasser wilfully, wantonly, or through gross negligence.

Subsection (c) preserves the attractive nuisance doctrine for children, and states it as five elements, all required. An owner may be liable for injury to a child from a highly dangerous artificial condition if:

the owner knew or reasonably should have known children were likely to trespass there; the owner knew or should have known the condition existed and realized or should have realized it involved an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to such children; the child, because of youth, did not discover the condition or realize the risk; the utility of maintaining it and the burden of eliminating the danger were slight compared with the risk; and the owner failed to exercise reasonable care to eliminate the danger or protect the child.

The fourth element is the one that decides most cases — a balance of the owner's burden against the risk to children.

Subsection (d) protects justified force: an owner whose actions are justified under the Penal Code's self-defence or property-defence provisions is not liable to a trespasser for damages arising from those actions.

Subsection (e) confirms the section adds nothing: it does not affect the other recreational use sections or create or increase the liability of any person.

Frequently Asked Questions

What duty is owed to a trespasser in Texas?

None, except a duty to refrain from injuring the trespasser wilfully, wantonly, or through gross negligence.

Does attractive nuisance still apply to children?

Yes, on five elements: known likelihood of child trespass, a known highly dangerous artificial condition posing unreasonable risk, a child too young to appreciate it, slight burden of elimination compared with the risk, and a failure to exercise reasonable care.

What if I used force against a trespasser?

An owner whose actions are justified under Subchapter C or D of Chapter 9 of the Penal Code is not liable to a trespasser for damages arising from them.

Does this section create new liability?

No. It expressly does not create or increase the liability of any person.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 101 (S.B. 1160), Sec. 3, eff. May 20, 2011.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 815 (H.B. 931), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2017.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source