§ 21.001.Definition
Title 2. Trial, Judgment, and Appeal · Subtitle B. Trial Matters · Chapter 21. Interpreters · Subchapter A. Interpreters for the Deaf · Last amended 1985 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 21.001
Plain-English Summary
One definition, and it is written around function rather than diagnosis.
"Deaf person" means an individual who has a hearing impairment, regardless of whether the person also has a speech impairment, that inhibits the person’s comprehension of proceedings or communication with others.
There is no audiological threshold. The test is not how much hearing has been lost but whether the impairment gets in the way — which means a person with partial hearing who cannot follow a courtroom qualifies, and the question is answered by what happens in the room rather than by a chart.
That is the right test for the setting. Courtrooms have poor acoustics, several people speaking, and speech that matters at the level of individual words.
The two effects named are distinct. Comprehension of proceedings is about following what is said; communication with others is about being understood. Either suffices, so a person who can follow the hearing but cannot make themselves understood is covered.
The speech impairment clause forecloses a specific argument — that someone with both impairments falls outside a provision about hearing. It reaches them expressly.
The definition governs this subchapter, which requires appointment of a qualified interpreter and regulates where the interpreter stands, the oath they take, their privilege, and their role in jury deliberations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who qualifies as a deaf person under this chapter?
Anyone whose hearing impairment inhibits comprehension of the proceedings or communication with others. There is no audiological threshold.
Does a speech impairment matter?
It does not disqualify. The definition applies regardless of whether the person also has a speech impairment.
Is partial hearing loss enough?
It can be. The test is whether the impairment inhibits comprehension or communication, not the degree of loss.
Amendment History
- Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.