RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 150E.002.Applicability of Chapter

Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 150E. Civil Actions or Arbitrations Involving Transportation Network Companies · Last amended 2023 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 150E.002 confines the chapter to claims against a transportation network company arising from the network itself or its relationship with a logged-on driver.

Full Text of § 150E.002

Text size

This chapter applies only to an action or arbitration proceeding in which:
(1)a transportation network company is a defendant;
(2)the claimant seeks recovery of damages for loss of property, bodily injury, or death;
(3)the claim for which the action or proceeding is brought arises out of the ownership, use, operation, or possession of a network vehicle while the vehicle's driver or passenger was logged on to a transportation network company's digital network; and
(4)the theory of recovery for which damages are sought against the transportation network company is based on:
(A)the ownership, operation, design, manufacture, or maintenance of a digital network accessed by a driver or passenger; or
(B)the relationship, affiliation, or interaction with a driver logged on to a transportation network company's digital network.
End

Plain-English Summary

An applicability provision with four cumulative conditions, and the fourth is the one that decides its scope.

The chapter applies only to an action or arbitration proceeding in which: a transportation network company is a defendant; the claimant seeks recovery for loss of property, bodily injury, or death; the claim arises out of the ownership, use, operation, or possession of a network vehicle while the vehicle’s driver or passenger was logged on to the company’s digital network; and the theory of recovery against the company is based on one of two things.

Those two theories are the heart of it: the ownership, operation, design, manufacture, or maintenance of the digital network accessed by a driver or passenger; or the relationship, affiliation, or interaction with a driver logged on to the network.

The second theory is the one these cases are built on. It is the vicarious-liability route — the argument that the company answers for its driver because of the relationship between them, whatever that relationship is called.

The first covers the platform as a product, treating the app itself as the thing that failed.

"While logged on" is a bright line and it cuts both ways. A driver between fares with the app running is within the chapter; the same driver with the app closed is an ordinary motorist and the company has no involvement.

Note that the claimant may be the passenger. The condition speaks of the driver or passenger being logged on, so a passenger’s own use of the network brings the claim within the chapter.

A claim against the driver personally is outside this chapter entirely and proceeds as ordinary motor vehicle negligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

When does this chapter apply?

Only where a transportation network company is a defendant, the claim is for property loss, injury or death, it arises from a network vehicle while someone was logged on, and the theory targets the network or the driver relationship.

Does it cover a claim against the driver?

No. A claim against the driver personally proceeds as ordinary motor vehicle negligence.

What if the driver was between fares?

If the app was on, the claim is within the chapter. If the driver was logged off, it is not.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 318 (H.B. 1745), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2023.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source