§ 140A.052.Civil Investigative Demand
Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 140A. Civil Racketeering Related to Trafficking of Persons · Subchapter B. Procedures and Evidence · Last amended 2017 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 140A.052
Plain-English Summary
The authorizing provision, and its trigger is deliberately low.
If the attorney general has reason to believe that a person may be in possession, custody, or control of documentary material or other evidence, or may have any information relevant to a civil racketeering investigation, they may before beginning a civil proceeding issue and serve a written demand.
Read the trigger closely: reason to believe the person may have any relevant information. That is not probable cause, and it does not require suspicion that the recipient did anything wrong.
A demand can therefore go to a witness — a bank, a landlord, a hotel — as readily as to a target.
"Before beginning a civil proceeding" is the point of the whole subchapter. Ordinary discovery requires a lawsuit, and a lawsuit requires a case the state can already plead. This gives compulsory process first, so the investigation can establish whether there is a case at all.
Four things may be demanded: production of documentary material for inspection and copying; written answers to written interrogatories; oral testimony; or any combination of them.
Those are the tools of civil discovery, made available before filing. The sections that follow attach the conditions — what the demand must say, how it is served, how it is resisted, and how each of the three is carried out.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a civil investigative demand?
A written pre-suit demand for documents, interrogatory answers, oral testimony, or a combination, issued by the attorney general during a racketeering investigation.
What must the attorney general suspect first?
Only reason to believe the person may possess material or may have any relevant information — not that the recipient did anything wrong.
Can it be issued before suit?
Yes. That is its purpose: compulsory process before a case is filed.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 685 (H.B. 29), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2017.