RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 100.001.Affirmative Defense

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 100. Use of Force in Defense of Commercial Nuclear Power Plants · Last amended 2025 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 100.001 gives an affirmative defence to nuclear plant security personnel, their employer, and the plant owner where the use of force was justified under the Penal Code.

Full Text of § 100.001

Text size

It is an affirmative defense to a civil action for damages for personal injury or death brought against a person performing duties under Article 2A.002(f), Code of Criminal Procedure, the person's employer, or the owner of a commercial nuclear power plant where the person was working, that at the time the cause of action arose the person was justified in using force under Chapter 9, Penal Code.
End

Plain-English Summary

A one-section chapter extending the justification defence to a specific security context.

It is an affirmative defence to a civil action for personal injury or death brought against a person performing duties under Article 2A.002(f), Code of Criminal Procedure, the person's employer, or the owner of a commercial nuclear power plant where the person was working, that at the time the person was justified in using force under Chapter 9, Penal Code.

The referenced Code of Criminal Procedure provision concerns security officers commissioned to protect commercial nuclear power plants — armed personnel with law enforcement powers confined to that setting.

Three parties are protected together: the officer, the employer, and the plant owner. That is the chapter's addition — the general civil immunity provision protects only the person who used the force.

Extending it up the chain matters because the security contractor and the plant operator would otherwise face vicarious liability for force the officer was legally entitled to use.

Note the form: an affirmative defence, not immunity. The general provision confers immunity; this confers a defence, which must be pleaded and proved and does not stop the suit proceeding.

The difference is real, though whether it was deliberate is not apparent from the text — the two provisions were enacted eight years apart.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who does this chapter protect?

A person performing commissioned security duties at a commercial nuclear power plant, that person's employer, and the plant owner.

What is the standard?

That the person was justified in using force under Chapter 9 of the Penal Code at the time.

How does it differ from Section 83.001?

That section confers immunity on the person who used the force. This confers an affirmative defence and extends it to the employer and the plant owner.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1237, Sec. 4, eff. June 20, 2003.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 765 (H.B. 4504), Sec. 2.011, eff. January 1, 2025.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source