RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 214-a.Action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice to be commenced within two years and six months; exceptions.

Article 2. Limitations of Time · Last amended 2018 · Last verified July 21, 2026

In one sentenceCPLR 214-a gives a patient two years and six months to sue for medical, dental, or podiatric malpractice, running from the act or omission or the end of continuous treatment, with separate discovery rules for retained foreign objects and undiagnosed cancer.

Full Text of CPLR 214-a

Text size

An action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice must be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission or failure complained of or last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission or failure; provided, however, that:
(a) where the action is based upon the discovery of a foreign object in the body of the patient, the action may be commenced within one year of the date of such discovery or of the date of discovery of facts which would reasonably lead to such discovery, whichever is earlier; and (b) where the action is based upon the alleged negligent failure to diagnose cancer or a malignant tumor, whether by act or omission, the action may be commenced within two years and six months of the later of either (i) when the person knows or reasonably should have known of such alleged negligent act or omission and knows or reasonably should have known that such alleged negligent act or omission has caused injury, provided, that such action shall be commenced no later than seven years from such alleged negligent act or omission, or (ii) the date of the last treatment where there is continuous treatment for such injury, illness or condition. For the purpose of this section the term “continuous treatment” shall not include examinations undertaken at the request of the patient for the sole purpose of ascertaining the state of the patient’s condition. For the purpose of this section the term “foreign object” shall not include a chemical compound, fixation device or prosthetic aid or device.

Plain-English Summary

CPLR 214-a sets the baseline deadline for medical, dental, and podiatric malpractice claims at two years and six months from the act, omission, or failure complained of. Where continuous treatment for the same illness, injury, or condition follows that act, the clock instead runs from the date of the last such treatment. That continuous-treatment rule keeps a patient from having to interrupt an ongoing course of care just to preserve a legal claim, though it doesn't extend to examinations a patient requests solely to check on their own condition.

Two built-in exceptions soften the general rule further. Where the claim rests on a foreign object left in the patient's body, the action may instead be brought within one year of discovering the object, or of when it reasonably should have been discovered, whichever is earlier — though the section narrows what counts as a foreign object, excluding chemical compounds, fixation devices, and prosthetic aids or devices, so a retained sponge or instrument qualifies but a failing hip implant does not.

A second exception, added in 2018 and often called Lavern's Law, addresses the negligent failure to diagnose cancer or a malignant tumor. There, the action may be brought within two years and six months of the later of two dates: when the patient knew or reasonably should have known both of the alleged negligent act and that it caused injury, capped at seven years from that act; or the date of the last continuous treatment for the condition. The extension responds to a real gap in the ordinary rule — a missed cancer diagnosis often causes no apparent harm until the disease progresses well past the original visit, long after a fixed two-and-a-half-year clock from the appointment itself would have run out.

CPLR 214-a is the exclusive path for these claims. CPLR 214-c's general toxic-exposure discovery rule expressly excludes medical and dental malpractice, channeling those claims back here, and CPLR 214(6) confirms the point by carving out malpractice other than medical, dental, or podiatric malpractice from its own three-year period. CPLR 208's tolling provisions for infancy and other disabilities can still extend the deadlines set here.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to sue for medical malpractice in New York?

Two years and six months from the act, omission, or failure complained of, or from the date of last treatment if there was continuous treatment for the same condition.

What if my doctor left a sponge or surgical instrument inside me?

CPLR 214-a allows the action to be brought within one year of discovering the foreign object, or of when it reasonably should have been discovered, whichever is earlier.

What is Lavern's Law and how does it change the malpractice deadline?

It's the 2018 exception in CPLR 214-a for a negligent failure to diagnose cancer, which allows suit within two years and six months of when the patient knew or should have known of the negligent act and the injury it caused, capped at seven years from that act.

Does the malpractice deadline pause while I'm still being treated by the same doctor?

Yes. Under the continuous-treatment rule, the clock runs from the date of the last treatment for the same illness, injury, or condition, rather than from the date of the original act or omission.

Does a hip replacement or pacemaker count as a foreign object for the one-year discovery rule?

No. CPLR 214-a specifically excludes prosthetic aids or devices, and fixation devices, from the definition of a foreign object.

Does the two-and-a-half-year deadline apply to dentists and podiatrists, not just physicians?

Yes. CPLR 214-a covers medical, dental, and podiatric malpractice alike under the same time periods.

Amendment History

Add, L 1975, ch 109, § 6; amd, L 1985, ch 760, § 3; L 1986, ch 485, § 3, eff July 21, 1986; L 2017, ch 506, § 2, eff Jan 31, 2018; L 2018, ch 1, § 2, effective January 31, 2018.

Source & verification. Provision text, History, and Advisory Committee Notes are reproduced verbatim from the Consolidated Laws of New York. Last verified July 21, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: New York medical malpractice statute of limitationsLavern's Law New York cancer misdiagnosishow long to sue a doctor in New Yorkforeign object left in body lawsuit deadline NYcontinuous treatment doctrine New York malpractice