RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 214-b.Action to recover damages for personal injury caused by contact with or exposure to phenoxy herbicides.

Article 2. Limitations of Time · Last amended 1982 · Last verified July 21, 2026

In one sentenceCPLR 214-b lets a veteran who served in Indo-China between 1962 and 1975 sue for personal injury caused by exposure to phenoxy herbicides like Agent Orange within two years of discovering the injury or its cause, whichever is later.

Full Text of CPLR 214-b

Text size

Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, an action to recover damages for personal injury caused by contact with or exposure to phenoxy herbicides while serving as a member of the armed forces of the United States in Indo-China from January first, nineteen hundred sixty-two through May seventh, nineteen hundred seventy-five, may be commenced within two years from the date of the discovery of such injury, or within two years from the date when through the exercise of reasonable diligence the cause of such injury should have been discovered, whichever is later.

Plain-English Summary

CPLR 214-b addresses a problem the ordinary three-year rule in CPLR 214 couldn't handle: injuries from Agent Orange and similar phenoxy herbicide exposure during the Vietnam era often didn't surface for years or decades after the exposure itself. Measuring the deadline from the exposure date, as the general rule would, meant many veterans' claims were already time-barred before the injury was even diagnosable.

The section instead gives a veteran who served as a member of the U.S. armed forces in Indo-China between January 1, 1962 and May 7, 1975 two years to sue, running from actual discovery of the injury or from when reasonable diligence should have revealed its cause — whichever comes later. That discovery-based approach protects a veteran whose latent injury takes years to connect back to service-era exposure.

CPLR 214-b was the first of several sections built around this same discovery logic. The legislature generalized the approach five years later in CPLR 214-c for latent toxic exposure claims of all kinds, and returned to it decades afterward in CPLR 214-i-B for post-9/11 veterans exposed to toxic burn pits. Together, these three sections form a family of military and toxic-exposure statutes united by the same idea: the clock should start when the injury and its cause become knowable, not when the exposure happened.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can bring a claim under CPLR 214-b?

A person injured by contact with or exposure to phenoxy herbicides while serving as a member of the U.S. armed forces in Indo-China from January 1, 1962 through May 7, 1975.

How long after discovering an Agent Orange-related illness can I sue in New York?

Two years from the date of discovery of the injury, or from when reasonable diligence should have revealed its cause, whichever is later.

Does the two-year clock start on the date of exposure?

No. It starts from discovery of the injury or of its cause, not from the date the herbicide exposure occurred.

Is CPLR 214-b connected to the toxic burn pit statute for more recent veterans?

Yes. CPLR 214-i-B applies the same discovery-based approach to post-9/11 veterans exposed to toxic burn pits, extending the model CPLR 214-b established for Agent Orange exposure.

Does CPLR 214-b cover any wartime chemical exposure, or only phenoxy herbicides?

Only exposure to phenoxy herbicides, such as Agent Orange, during service in Indo-China within the dates the section specifies.

Amendment History

Add, L 1981, ch 266, § 3; amd, L 1982, ch 153, § 1, eff June 1, 1982.

Source & verification. Provision text, History, and Advisory Committee Notes are reproduced verbatim from the Consolidated Laws of New York. Last verified July 21, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Agent Orange lawsuit New York statute of limitationsVietnam veteran herbicide exposure lawsuit deadlinephenoxy herbicide injury lawsuit NYAgent Orange discovery rule New York