Rule 5:10-15.Adoptions of United States Citizens by Residents of Foreign Countries That Are...
Last amended September 1, 2011 · Current through September 1, 2026 · Last verified September 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5:10-15
Amendment History
New Jersey publishes each rule’s amendment record in a “Note” beneath the rule. It is reproduced verbatim below; a “Source” line names the former rule the current one grew out of, and “R. (1969)” citations refer to the earlier numbering it replaced.
Note: Adopted July 21, 2011 to be effective September 1, 2011.
Plain-English Summary
This is the outgoing direction of intercountry adoption — a New Jersey child going to a family abroad — and the Hague Convention machinery makes it the most documented proceeding in the chapter. The complaint alleges the facts bearing on whether the Convention applies and what the plaintiff seeks, and the court determines whether the Convention applies in the country where the child is or will be living.
If it does, and the court is asked to support a request for a Hague Certificate of Adoption or Declaration of Custody, it must receive evidence on thirteen points. They cover the provider (accredited by the Department of State, committed to securing the child's transfer and to keeping the foreign Central Authority informed, deriving no improper financial gain and disclosing the financial arrangement), the child (a completed background study, eligibility for adoption under New Jersey law, and reasonable but unsuccessful efforts to place the child in the United States unless an exception applies), and the family (a home study covering identity, suitability, background, medical and family history, motives and capacity; confirmation that a competent authority found them eligible and counselled; and criminal background checks). The receiving country's Central Authority must have declared the child may enter and reside permanently and consented to the adoption.
Consent gets its own five conditions, and they read as a safeguard against trafficking: counselling was provided to any consenting parent, the parents were informed of the legal effect of adoption, consent was freely given without inducement by compensation, it was not subsequently withdrawn, and it was taken only after the child's birth.
Satisfied, the court makes findings that the placement is in the child's best interest and that the federal regulatory requirements are met, then orders that the child is eligible for adoption, that the grant of custody is in the child's best interests, and that custody is granted to the named family for purposes of adoption.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must the court find before supporting a Hague Adoption Certificate?
That the child is eligible for adoption and the placement is in the child's best interests, on evidence covering thirteen points about the adoption service provider, the child, the family's home study, the receiving country's consent, and the validity of the birth parents' consents.
What makes a birth parent's consent valid in a Hague case?
Five things: counseling was provided to the consenting parent; the parents were informed of the legal effect of adoption; the consent was freely given without inducement by compensation; it was not subsequently withdrawn; and it was taken only after the birth of the child.
Must the child first be offered to United States families?
The court must receive evidence that the Hague-approved agency or person made reasonable efforts to place the child in the United States but was unable to do so, or that an exception to that requirement applies.