§ 25-21,258.Environmental audit; use as evidence; exceptions.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1998 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,258
Source
Laws 1998, LB 395, § 6.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-21,258 draws a boundary around what the privilege in section 25-21,256 can protect in the first place. Five categories fall outside it altogether: documents or information required to be developed, maintained, or reported under any environmental requirement; documents or information required to be available or furnished to a regulatory agency under an environmental requirement or any other law; documents or information relating to grants or other financial assistance sponsored by the state or federal government; information a regulatory agency obtained through its own observation, inspection, sampling, or monitoring under an environmental requirement; and information obtained from any source independent of the audit itself.
The thread running through all five is that the privilege protects self-generated audit material born of real voluntary effort — not records a business had to keep or produce anyway, not paperwork tied to public funding, and not facts a regulator found on its own without relying on the audit. Because those categories exist, or could be discovered, regardless of whether the audit was ever performed, none of them get the protection the audit itself receives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the privilege protect documents I am required to keep for a permit?
No. Documents or information required to be developed, maintained, or reported under an environmental requirement fall outside the privilege entirely.
Does the privilege cover records tied to a government grant?
No. Documents or information relating to grants or other financial assistance sponsored by the state or federal government are excluded from protection.
What if a regulatory agency found the same information through its own inspection?
Information a regulatory agency obtained through its own observation, inspection, sampling, or monitoring under an environmental requirement is not protected, regardless of whether it also appears in an audit.
How does this section relate to the exceptions in section 25-21,259?
This section describes categories of information that never fall within the privilege in the first place; section 25-21,259 describes circumstances in which a court can order an otherwise privileged audit into evidence.
Can part of an audit still be excluded from protection even if other parts are privileged?
Yes. Because these five categories are excluded by their nature, information that fits one of them is not protected even if it appears within an otherwise qualifying environmental audit.