RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 25-21,185.Actions accruing before February 8, 1992, for injuries to person or property; contributory negligence; comparative negligence.

Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1992 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceThis section, limited to actions that accrued before February 8, 1992, lets a plaintiff recover despite slight contributory negligence when the defendant’s negligence was gross by comparison, with the jury reducing damages in proportion to the plaintiff’s share of fault.

Full Text of § 25-21,185

Text size

In all actions accruing before February 8, 1992, brought to recover damages for injuries to a person or to property caused by the negligence or act or omission giving rise to strict liability in tort of another, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery when the contributory negligence of the plaintiff was slight and the negligence or act or omission giving rise to strict liability in tort of the defendant was gross in comparison, but the contributory negligence of the plaintiff shall be considered by the jury in the mitigation of damages in proportion to the amount of contributory negligence attributable to the plaintiff, and all questions of negligence or act or omission giving rise to strict liability in tort and contributory negligence shall be for the jury.

Source

Laws 1913, c. 124, § 1, p. 311; R.S.1913, § 7892; C.S.1922, § 8834; C.S.1929, § 20-1151; R.S.1943, § 25-1151; Laws 1978, LB 665, § 6; R.S.1943, (1979), § 25-1151; Laws 1992, LB 262, § 9.

Plain-English Summary

Section 25-21,185 preserves Nebraska’s older, "slight-gross" comparative negligence rule for cases that predate the modern comparative fault statute. It applies only to actions accruing before February 8, 1992, brought to recover for injury to a person or to property caused by another’s negligence, or by an act or omission giving rise to strict liability in tort.

Under that older rule, a plaintiff’s own contributory negligence does not automatically bar recovery. It bars recovery only if the comparison between the two sides tips against the plaintiff; when the plaintiff’s contributory negligence was slight and the defendant’s negligence, or act or omission giving rise to strict liability, was gross by comparison, the plaintiff may still recover. Even then, the jury reduces the damages awarded in proportion to the plaintiff’s share of the fault, so a plaintiff who recovers under this standard still absorbs part of the loss corresponding to the plaintiff’s own contributory negligence.

The statute leaves all of this, including whether the negligence was slight or gross and how negligence and contributory negligence compare, to the jury. For actions accruing on or after February 8, 1992, this slight-gross framework no longer applies; those cases fall instead under the modified comparative negligence scheme in sections 25-21,185.07 through 25-21,185.12.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which cases does this section govern?

Only actions accruing before February 8, 1992, for injury to a person or to property caused by another’s negligence or by an act or omission giving rise to strict liability in tort.

Does a plaintiff’s own carelessness automatically bar recovery under this section?

No. It bars recovery only where the comparison does not favor the plaintiff. Recovery survives when the plaintiff’s contributory negligence was slight and the defendant’s negligence was gross by comparison.

If a plaintiff recovers under the slight-gross standard, does the plaintiff get the full amount of damages?

No. The jury considers the plaintiff’s contributory negligence in mitigation of damages, reducing the award in proportion to the plaintiff’s share of fault.

Who decides whether the plaintiff’s negligence was slight and the defendant’s was gross?

The jury. The section states that all questions of negligence, act or omission giving rise to strict liability, and contributory negligence are for the jury.

Does this slight-gross rule still apply to a case that accrued last year?

No. This section applies only to actions accruing before February 8, 1992. Later actions are governed by sections 25-21,185.07 through 25-21,185.12.

Does this section cover claims based on strict liability in tort, or only ordinary negligence?

Both. It covers injury caused by negligence and injury caused by an act or omission giving rise to strict liability in tort.

Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: nebraska old contributory negligence ruleslight negligence gross negligence comparisonpre 1992 negligence law nebraskacontributory negligence mitigation of damagesnebraska comparative negligence history