§ 25-21,185.09.Civil actions to which contributory negligence is a defense; effect on recovery.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1992 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,185.09
Source
Laws 1992, LB 262, § 3.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-21,185.09 is the operative rule at the center of Nebraska’s modern comparative negligence scheme. Any contributory negligence chargeable to the claimant reduces, proportionately, the damages awarded for an injury attributable to that negligence. A claimant who bears some fault does not lose the entire claim on that basis alone; the award shrinks to reflect the claimant’s share of the total fault.
The proportional reduction has a hard limit. If the claimant’s contributory negligence is equal to or greater than the total negligence of all the persons against whom recovery is sought, the claimant is totally barred from recovery. Put another way, a claimant can recover only when the claimant’s own share of fault is less than the combined fault attributed to the defendant or defendants; once the claimant’s share reaches even parity with that combined total, the claim fails outright rather than being reduced further.
Because the comparison runs against the combined negligence of all defendants, not against each defendant individually, a claimant facing several defendants is measured against their total fault together. The section closes by requiring the jury to be instructed on the effects of this allocation, so jurors understand how their percentage findings translate into either a reduced award or a complete bar before they render a verdict.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does being partly at fault always bar a Nebraska plaintiff from recovering?
No. Contributory negligence reduces the damages award in proportion to the claimant’s fault, but it bars recovery entirely only when that fault equals or exceeds the combined negligence of all the defendants.
What percentage of fault bars recovery under this section?
Fifty percent or more, measured against the combined negligence of all persons against whom recovery is sought. A claimant found equally or more at fault than the defendants combined recovers nothing.
If I am found 30 percent at fault and the defendants combined are 70 percent at fault, what happens to my damages?
The award for the injury attributable to your negligence is reduced by that 30 percent, rather than being barred, since your share is less than the defendants’ combined share.
Is my fault compared against each defendant separately or against all of them together?
Against the total negligence of all persons against whom recovery is sought, so multiple defendants’ fault is combined for this comparison.
Does the jury need any special instruction under this section?
Yes. The section requires the jury to be instructed on the effects of the allocation of negligence, so it understands how its fault findings determine the outcome.
Does this section apply to property damage claims as well as personal injury claims?
Section 25-21,185.07 extends this comparative negligence framework to actions for harm to property as well as injury to or death of a person, so this section’s rule reaches property damage claims covered by that framework.