§ 25-21,185.07.Civil actions to which contributory negligence is a defense; sections applicable.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1992 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,185.07
Source
Laws 1992, LB 262, § 1.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-21,185.07 marks the starting line for Nebraska’s modern comparative negligence framework. It applies sections 25-21,185.07 through 25-21,185.12 to all civil actions to which contributory negligence may, under the law, be a defense, so long as the action accrued on or after February 8, 1992, and seeks damages for injury to or death of a person or harm to property. The theory of liability behind the claim does not matter; whether it sounds in negligence, strict liability, or something else, the action falls inside this framework if contributory negligence could be a defense to it.
Actions that accrued before that February 1992 date stay outside this newer scheme. Those earlier cases continue to be governed by the law in effect immediately before the date, which for many claims means the slight-gross comparison rule described in section 25-21,185.
The section closes with a specific instruction about wrongful death. Nothing in sections 25-21,185.07 through 25-21,185.12 limits a wrongful death claim brought under sections 30-809 and 30-810, but those claims are still subject to this same set of comparative negligence sections. In other words, wrongful death actions are not carved out of the comparative fault analysis; they are folded into it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggers coverage under sections 25-21,185.07 to 25-21,185.12?
An action to which contributory negligence may, under the law, be a defense, seeking damages for injury to or death of a person or harm to property, that accrued on or after February 8, 1992.
Does the legal theory behind my claim matter for whether these sections apply?
No. The section applies regardless of the theory of liability, as long as contributory negligence could be a defense to the claim.
What law governs an action that accrued before February 8, 1992?
The law in effect immediately before that date, rather than sections 25-21,185.07 through 25-21,185.12.
Do these sections apply to wrongful death claims?
Yes. The section states that nothing in this group of sections limits a wrongful death claim under sections 30-809 and 30-810, but such claims remain subject to these comparative negligence sections.
Does this section itself set out how negligence is compared or how damages are reduced?
No. It defines which actions the framework covers; the mechanics of comparing fault and adjusting recovery appear in the sections that follow it.
Why does the date February 8, 1992 matter?
It is the dividing line the Legislature drew between the older slight-gross comparison rule and the modified comparative negligence scheme these sections establish.