Rule 369.Role of County Attorney and Employees of the County Agency
Last amended November 22, 2023 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 369
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 369.02, subd. 1 is modified in 2023 to make it consistent with Minn. Stat. § 518A.46, subd. 2.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 369 splits responsibility between the county attorney and the nonattorney staff at the county agency. Every legal document a county agency employee prepares for use in the expedited process or in district court needs the county attorney's review and approval as to form and content before it goes anywhere. At a hearing, the county agency has to appear through counsel, though the county attorney can authorize an employee to appear instead just to present an agreement or stipulation the parties already reached.
Within that framework, employees can do a good deal of the day-to-day work under the county attorney's direction. They may meet with parties, explain how the expedited process works, prepare pleadings, including subpoenas as documents, subject to the county attorney's review and approval, prepare judicial notices, negotiate settlement agreements, and appear as witnesses or present agreed stipulations at a hearing if asked to. Issuing an administrative subpoena is different: the rule grants that power to employees directly, without the same review-and-approval step pleadings go through. Some of this work does not need the county attorney's direction at all: employees can perform the specific duties a support statute assigns directly to them, and can testify at a hearing whenever a party or the magistrate asks them to.
Two lines stay firm no matter how much responsibility an employee takes on. An employee can never represent the county agency at a hearing, or advocate a position on behalf of any party, and an employee can never recommend a support amount at a hearing unless called as a witness, though calculating and presenting the numbers behind a support calculation is not treated as making a recommendation. None of this work counts as the unauthorized practice of law, precisely because the rule spells out its limits so specifically.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a county attorney have to approve documents prepared by county agency staff?
Yes. The county attorney must review and approve as to form and content every legal document a county agency employee prepares for the expedited process or for district court.
Can a county agency employee appear at a hearing instead of the county attorney?
Only to present an agreement or stipulation the parties have already reached, and only if the county attorney authorizes it; otherwise the county agency must appear through counsel.
Can a county agency employee recommend a support amount at a hearing?
No, not unless that employee is called as a witness. Calculating and presenting the numbers behind a support calculation is not treated as a recommendation, but offering an opinion on what the support amount should be is off limits otherwise.
Do county agency employees need the county attorney's direction for everything they do?
No. Employees may perform certain duties assigned to them directly by statute without the county attorney's direction, and may testify at a hearing whenever a party or the magistrate requests it.
Is a county agency employee practicing law when handling these tasks?
No. Rule 369 states that performing the duties it authorizes, such as preparing pleadings or negotiating settlements under the county attorney's direction, does not constitute the unauthorized practice of law.
Advisory Committee Comment – 2008 Amendment
Rule 369.02, subd. 3, is amended to update the statutory references to reflect the recodification, effective January 1, 2007, of portions of the relevant statutes, that became part of Minn. Stat. ch. 518A.