Rule 364.Hearing Process
Last amended November 22, 2023 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 364
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 364.03 is modified in 2023 to remove notice to the chief judge, which has fallen out of practice and will minimize burdens on court staff.
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 364.04 is modified in 2023 to recognize that in remote proceedings parties will not bring evidentiary documents to the hearing as they would for an in-person hearing, but parties are required to submit them to the court and other parties at least 7 days in advance of the hearing in the manner directed by applicable court order or notice. The Minnesota Digital Exhibit System (MNDES), to the extent that it is available in a particular county, was designed for submission of evidentiary documents to the court. Details regarding MNDES are available on the main judicial branch website (www.mncourts.gov).
Advisory Committee Comment
Rule 364.05 provides that a continuance may be granted for good cause. Examples of good cause include: death or incapacitating illness of a party or attorney of a party; lack of proper notice of the hearing; a substitution of the attorney of a party; a change in the parties or pleadings requiring postponement; an agreement for a continuance by all parties provided that it is shown that more time is clearly necessary. Good cause does not include: intentional delay; unavailability of counsel due to engagement in another judicial or administrative proceeding unless all other members of the attorney’s firm familiar with the case are similarly engaged, or if the notice of the other proceeding was received prior to the notice of the hearing for which the continuance is sought; unavailability of a witness if the witness’ testimony can be taken by deposition; and failure of the attorney to properly utilize the statutory notice period to prepare for the hearing.
Advisory Committee Comment
Under Minn. Stat. § 257.70 (2000), hearings regarding the establishment of parentage are closed to the public. Other proceedings identified in Rule 353.01 are generally open to the public.
Advisory Committee Comment
Under Minn. Stat. § 484.72, subds. 1, 6 (2000), records of hearings and other proceedings in the expedited process may be made either by competent stenographers or by use of electronic recording equipment. (1999 Minn. Laws 196, art. 1, § 3.) If electronic recording equipment is used, it must meet the minimum standards promulgated by the state court administrator and must be operated and monitored by a person who meets the minimum qualifications promulgated by the state court administrator. The minimum standards are set forth in Minnesota State Court System Administrative Policy, dated June 29, 1999.
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 364.08 is modified in 2023 to make it consistent with Rule 2.02(f).
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 364.09, subd. 3 is modified in 2023 to recognize that in remote proceedings parties will not bring evidentiary documents to the hearings as they would for an in-person hearing, but parties are required to submit them to the court and other parties at least 7 days in advance of the hearing as directed by applicable court order or notice. The Minnesota Digital Exhibit System (MNDES), to the extent that is available in a particular county, was designed for submission of evidentiary documents to the court. Details regarding MNDES are available on the main judicial branch website (www.mncourts.gov).
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 364.10 is modified in 2023 to clarify the types of evidence that may be considered by the magistrate.
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendments
Rule 364.14 is modified in 2023 to recognize that documents submitted electronically after the deadline for a remote proceeding are not physically returned.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective July 1, 2015.)
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
- (Amended effective January 1, 2020.)
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
- (Amended effective November 22, 2023.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 364 starts from a default in the party's favor: every party has a right to a hearing unless some other rule says otherwise. Once a written answer or a request for a hearing comes in, the initiating party is responsible for getting a hearing date from the court administrator and serving notice of the date, time, and location on everyone, including the county agency, at least 14 days before the hearing happens. Timing then runs on its own schedule: a hearing cannot happen sooner than 21 days after the summons and complaint, or the motion, was served, unless the parties waive that waiting period, and the rule pushes everyone to hold the hearing within 60 days of service, or within 60 days of receiving genetic test results in a parentage case, though missing that 60-day target does not strip the magistrate of authority to act; it is a goal the process is built around, not a deadline that voids the case.
A hearing can still be delayed by agreement of the parties or a showing of good cause, weighed against the requesting party's ability to proceed effectively without one. Rule 364.05 sets only that standard itself; the drafting history illustrates it with examples such as a party's or attorney's death or incapacitating illness, a late substitution of counsel, or an agreed need for more time as likely good cause, and a lawyer's own scheduling conflict with a case already known about, or a witness who could testify by deposition instead, as likely not.
Once a hearing is underway, the child support magistrate runs it. The magistrate must explain the purpose of the hearing and how it will proceed at the very start, keep the hearing open to the public unless there is good cause to close it, and take charge of making sure a clear and accurate record of everything that happens gets made.
The rule also lays out the evidentiary core of a hearing, in the seven subdivisions that follow. Each party may present evidence, rebuttal testimony, and argument, whether through documents, narrative or question-and-answer testimony, or a sworn affidavit offered instead of live testimony, and everyone must submit copies of what they intend to offer at least 7 days beforehand. The child support magistrate can admit hearsay and any other evidence with real probative value, may take judicial notice of undisputed facts on the record, and may ask witnesses questions when needed to round out the findings. The party proposing that some action be taken carries the burden of proving it by a preponderance of the evidence, each side can call and cross-examine an adverse party or that party's witnesses, and the magistrate may leave the record open for up to 14 days after the hearing for additional submissions before the record closes and a decision follows.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much advance notice must I get before an expedited process hearing?
At least 14 days. The initiating party must serve notice of the hearing's date, time, and location on every party and the county agency at least 14 days before the hearing.
How soon can a hearing be scheduled after a case is filed?
Not sooner than 21 days after the summons and complaint, or the notice of motion, was served, unless every party agrees to waive that waiting period.
Is there a deadline for holding the hearing itself?
The rule directs that every effort be made to hold the hearing within 60 days of service, or within 60 days of receiving genetic test results in a parentage case, though going past that point does not take away the magistrate's authority to decide the case.
What counts as good cause for a continuance of a hearing?
Rule 364.05 itself asks only whether the parties agree or whether good cause exists, weighed against the requesting party's ability to proceed effectively without a continuance. The drafting history illustrates good cause with examples like a party's or attorney's death or incapacitating illness, a late substitution of counsel, or an agreed need for more time, and treats a lawyer's own scheduling conflict with a case already known about as falling short.
Who has to prove their case at an expedited process hearing?
The party proposing that some action be taken, such as establishing or changing a support obligation, must prove the facts behind it by a preponderance of the evidence, and a party raising an affirmative defense carries that same burden for the defense. Each side may also present documents and testimony, cross-examine the other side or its witnesses, and rely on hearsay at the hearing if it has real probative value.
Advisory Committee Comment
Federal law requires 75% of cases commenced in the Expedited Process to be completed within 6 months from the date of service of process and 90% of the cases to be completed within 12 months from the date of service of process. 45 C.F.R. § 303.101 (2000). If the hearing is initially scheduled within 60 days under Rule 364.03 and is later continued to beyond 60 days, that fact must be reported to the chief judge of the judicial district.