Art. 2338.Judgment Creditor Having Superior Privilege; Price Insufficient to Satisfy Inferior Mortgage
Book IV. Execution of Judgments · Title II. Money Judgments · Chapter 2. Judicial Sale Under Fieri Facias · Last amended 1989 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 2338
Amendment History
Acts 1987, No. 939, §1; Acts 1989, No. 137, §18, eff. 9/1/1989.
Plain-English Summary
Articles 2335 and 2337 deal with a seizing creditor whose claim ranks below someone else's mortgage or lien. Article 2338 covers the opposite situation, where the seizing creditor is the one holding the superior security interest, mortgage, lien, or privilege on the property. Because that creditor sits at the front of the line for payment, a low sale price threatens no one ranked ahead of him, since no one is.
That is why Article 2338 lets him choose to push the sale through even when the bidding will not cover the full amount of his own claim, let alone any inferior claims behind it. Accepting less than full satisfaction is his call to make, since accepting a shortfall affects only his own recovery and leaves nothing for the junior creditors to lose that they were not already going to lose anyway.
Paragraph B supplies a safeguard for when that superior seizing creditor is not there to make that call. If he is absent or unrepresented at the sale, the sheriff cannot let the property go for less than the amount needed to fully satisfy his writ and costs, since no one is present to consent to a discount on his behalf. Under Article 2344(G), a creditor who bids in an online auction, or who tells the platform he is present or will not bid, counts as present for purposes of this rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
If the seizing creditor's own lien outranks everyone else, can the sale still go through at a low price?
Yes. Article 2338 lets that seizing creditor require the sale to proceed even if the price will not fully satisfy his claim or the junior liens on the property.
Why does it matter whether the seizing creditor shows up to the sale?
Because accepting a low price is his choice to make. If he is not there to make it, Article 2338(B) protects his claim by setting a floor equal to what fully satisfies his writ and costs.
What happens if the superior seizing creditor is absent from the sale?
The property cannot be sold for less than the amount necessary to fully satisfy his writ plus costs.
Does bidding online count as being present at the sale for this rule?
Yes. Under Article 2344(G), entering a bid at an online auction, or indicating on the platform that he is present or will not bid, counts as presence at the sale under Article 2338.