Art. 2339.Judgment Debtor and Creditor May Bid
Book IV. Execution of Judgments · Title II. Money Judgments · Chapter 2. Judicial Sale Under Fieri Facias · Amendment history unavailable · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 2339
Plain-English Summary
It might seem unusual for the two parties on opposite sides of the underlying dispute to be allowed to bid on the property being sold to satisfy that dispute, but Article 2339 opens the sale to both of them without restriction, the same as any other bidder.
For a debtor, this matters in practice when family funds, a new loan, or some other source of cash makes it possible to bid on the property and keep it, effectively buying back what was seized rather than losing it permanently to a stranger. Nothing in this article limits the debtor's participation to a token or symbolic bid; he can bid to win.
For the seizing creditor, bidding offers a way to acquire the property directly if the bidding at the sale seems to be settling well below what the property is worth, rather than accepting a low cash recovery and watching the property go to someone else for less than its value. This possibility connects to Article 2338, where a creditor holding the superior lien on the property has particular latitude in deciding what price to accept at his own sale.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the person whose property was seized bid to buy it back at the sheriff's sale?
Yes. Article 2339 allows the judgment debtor to bid at the sale of his own seized property, along with any other member of the public.
Can the creditor who forced the sale also bid on the property?
Yes. The seizing creditor may bid at the sale under Article 2339, the same as the debtor or any other bidder.
Are the debtor and creditor bidding under different rules than the public?
Article 2339 does not set separate bidding rules for them; it confirms that both may participate as bidders alongside the public.
Why would a creditor want to bid on the property instead of collecting cash proceeds?
If bidding at the sale is trending well below the property's value, the creditor may prefer to acquire the property directly rather than accept a low-priced sale to a third party.