RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Art. 2337.Price Insufficient to Discharge Superior Privileges; Property Not Sold

Book IV. Execution of Judgments · Title II. Money Judgments · Chapter 2. Judicial Sale Under Fieri Facias · Enacted 1989 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026

In one sentenceArticle 2337 blocks a judicial sale outright, at either the first or a later offering, if the highest bid is not enough to cover both the costs of the sale and the security interests, mortgages, liens, and privileges that outrank the seizing creditor's own claim.

Full Text of Art. 2337

Text size

If the price offered by the highest bidder at the first or subsequent offering is not sufficient to discharge the costs of the sale and the security interests, mortgages, liens, and privileges superior to that of the seizing creditor, the property shall not be sold.

Amendment History

Acts 1989, No. 137, §18, eff. 9/1/1989.

Plain-English Summary

Article 2336 lets a second offering sell for whatever price it draws, with no two-thirds floor protecting the debtor's equity. Article 2337 sets a different kind of floor that applies regardless of which offering is underway, because it protects a different interest: the superior lienholders and the basic costs of running the sale, rather than the debtor's stake in the property.

If the highest bid at the first offering, or at any later offering, will not stretch far enough to cover the costs of the sale and pay off the security interests, mortgages, liens, and privileges that outrank the seizing creditor's, the sale cannot happen. That is true even after a property has already failed to reach two-thirds of its appraised value and moved to a second offering under Article 2336; a bid that clears that lower bar can still fail this one.

Because this rule turns on knowing exactly what the superior encumbrances add up to, it works hand in hand with Article 2336.1, which gives the sheriff or the seizing creditor a formal way to obtain that payoff figure from the superior lienholder before the sale date arrives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a Louisiana sheriff's sale go through if the winning bid doesn't cover a superior mortgage?

No. Article 2337 blocks the sale if the highest bid will not cover both the costs of sale and any superior security interests, mortgages, liens, and privileges.

Does the two-thirds appraisal rule from Article 2336 still matter here?

They are separate requirements. A bid can clear the two-thirds floor at a first offering, or have no floor at all at a second offering, and still fail Article 2337 if it does not cover costs and superior encumbrances.

What exactly does the winning bid have to cover for the sale to proceed?

The costs of the sale and the security interests, mortgages, liens, and privileges that outrank the seizing creditor's claim.

Does this rule apply at a second offering, not just the first?

Yes. Article 2337 applies whether the insufficient bid comes at the first or a subsequent offering.

Source & verification. Article text is reproduced verbatim from the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure (legis.la.gov). Enacted by the Louisiana Legislature. Last verified July 30, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: bid too low sheriff's sale LouisianaArticle 2337 Louisianasale blocked superior lien not coveredinsufficient price judicial sale Louisianaproperty not sold sheriff's auction