§ 19-11-61.Procedure when responding court unable to obtain jurisdiction; cooperation of police in locating respondent; transfer of documents upon location of respondent or his property
Chapter 11. Enforcement of Duty of Support · Article 2. Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act · Last amended 1984 · Last verified October 9, 2026
Full Text of § 19-11-61
Plain-English Summary
Petitions sent across state lines often carry stale addresses. This section tells a Georgia court acting as the responding state what to do when it can’t obtain jurisdiction of the respondent or the respondent’s property, whether because the petition is inaccurate or inadequate or for any other reason. The court must do three things: tell the court in the initiating state; on its own initiative, use all means at its disposal to trace the respondent or the property; and hold the case until it receives more accurate information or an amended petition from the initiating court, or word from the district attorney that the matter should be transferred. Local police and the state police must cooperate with the court in locating any respondent the petition alleges is present in Georgia.
Subsection (b) handles a respondent who has moved on. If the respondent or the property isn’t found in the county, and the district attorney discovers that the respondent or the property may be found in another Georgia county or in another state, the district attorney must tell the court. The clerk then forwards the documents received from the initiating court to the superior court in that Georgia county, or to the appropriate court, information agency or other proper officials of the other state. The clerk must notify the court that sent the documents that they’ve been forwarded. The section was amended in 1984.
Article 2 has been closed to new petitions since January 1, 1998 (§ 19-11-40.1). Article 3, the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, spreads these tasks among other provisions: § 19-11-125 has a tribunal that receives a pleading in error forward it to an appropriate tribunal and notify the petitioner, and § 19-11-129 has the Department of Human Services gather information on where an obligor and the obligor’s property are located.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened if the Georgia court couldn’t find the other parent in a URESA case?
The court had to tell the initiating court, use all means at its disposal on its own initiative to trace the respondent or the respondent’s property, and hold the case pending more accurate information, an amended petition, or word from the district attorney that the case should be transferred.
Did the police have to help find the respondent?
Yes. The section says local police authorities and the state police shall cooperate with the court in locating any respondent alleged by the petition to be present in Georgia. That duty sits alongside the court’s own duty to use all means at its disposal to trace the respondent or the respondent’s property.
What if the respondent had moved to another county or state?
If the district attorney discovered that the respondent or the respondent’s property might be found in another Georgia county or another state, the district attorney had to tell the court. The clerk then forwarded the papers to the superior court in that county, or to the appropriate court, information agency or other proper officials of the other state, and notified the court that had sent them.
Was a URESA case dismissed if the respondent couldn’t be found?
The section doesn’t call for dismissal. It tells the court to hold the case pending the receipt of more accurate information or an amended petition from the initiating court, or information from the district attorney that the matter should be transferred.
Who told the initiating court what was happening?
The Georgia court and the clerk. When the court couldn’t obtain jurisdiction, it had to communicate that fact to the initiating court. When the clerk forwarded the documents elsewhere under subsection (b), the clerk had to notify the court that sent them that they had been forwarded.
Amendment History
Laws 1958, p. 34, § 17; Laws 1984, p. 387, § 1.