RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-15-16.Limitations on recovery of attorney fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation; utilization of contingent fee agreements

Chapter 15. Court and Litigation Costs · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceO.C.G.A. § 9-15-16 bars a party from recovering the same attorney’s fees, court costs, or litigation expenses more than once under overlapping fee-shifting statutes, makes a contingent fee agreement inadmissible to prove that a statutory fee request is reasonable, and preserves any separate contractual right to recover fees or costs.

Full Text of § 9-15-16

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) In any civil action, no party shall recover the same attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation more than once pursuant to one or more statutes authorizing awards of attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation, whether such statute or statutes authorize such awards for compensatory or punitive purposes, unless the statute or statutes specifically authorize the recovery of duplicate attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation.
(b) In any civil action, if a party seeks to recover attorney’s fees pursuant to any statute authorizing an award of reasonable attorney’s fees, a contingent fee agreement between such party and such party’s attorney shall not be admissible as proof of the reasonableness of the fees.
(c) Nothing in this Code section shall limit or diminish any contractual right to recover attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation.

Plain-English Summary

Georgia has more than one statute that shifts attorney’s fees, court costs, or litigation expenses to a losing or misbehaving party — this chapter alone includes Code Sections 9-15-14 and 9-15-15, and Code Section 9-11-68 adds another route in tort cases. This section, enacted in 2025, addresses what happens when more than one of those statutes could apply to the same fees. Subsection (a) bars a party from recovering the same attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation more than once under one or more fee-shifting statutes, whether those statutes authorize the award for compensatory or punitive purposes, unless a statute specifically authorizes duplicate recovery.

Subsection (b) addresses a different problem: how a party proves its fees are reasonable. When a party seeks fees under a statute authorizing an award of reasonable attorney’s fees, a contingent fee agreement between that party and its attorney can’t be offered as proof that the fees claimed are reasonable. That keeps a percentage-based fee arrangement from being used to justify a dollar figure under a statute asking the court to assess reasonableness on its own terms.

Subsection (c) closes the section by making clear it doesn’t touch contract law. Nothing here limits or diminishes any contractual right to recover attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation — a fee-shifting clause in a private agreement operates independently of the statutory limits this section imposes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I recover the same attorney’s fees twice under two different Georgia fee-shifting statutes?

No. Subsection (a) bars recovering the same fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation more than once under multiple statutes, unless those statutes specifically authorize duplicate recovery.

Does the no-double-recovery rule depend on whether the fee award is compensatory or punitive?

No. Subsection (a) applies regardless of whether the statutes involved authorize the award for compensatory or punitive purposes.

Can I use my contingent fee agreement to prove my requested fees are reasonable?

No. Subsection (b) makes a contingent fee agreement inadmissible for that purpose when a party seeks fees under a statute authorizing an award of reasonable attorney’s fees.

Does this section affect a contract that gives me the right to recover attorney’s fees?

No. Subsection (c) preserves any contractual right to recover attorney’s fees, court costs, or expenses of litigation.

When did this section take effect?

It was enacted by the 2025 Georgia General Assembly and became effective April 21, 2025.

Amendment History

Code 1981, § 9-15-16, enacted by Ga. L. 2025, p. 19, § 4/SB 68, effective April 21, 2025.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia double recovery attorney fees bancontingent fee agreement admissibility georgiageorgia attorney fee stacking statute2025 georgia attorney fees law