§ 9-15-14.Litigation costs and attorney’s fees assessed for frivolous actions and defenses
Chapter 15. Court and Litigation Costs · Last amended 2001 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-15-14
Plain-English Summary
Subsection (a) sets a mandatory standard. In any civil action in a court of record, a party who faced a claim, defense, or other position marked by a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact — one no court could reasonably have been expected to accept — shall be awarded reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and litigation expenses. The court decides who pays: the fees may be assessed against the party who advanced the claim or defense, against that party’s attorney, or against both, in whatever split the court finds just.
Subsection (b) supplies a second, discretionary path, reachable on the motion of any party or the court’s own initiative. The court may assess fees and expenses if it finds that an attorney or party brought or defended an action, or a part of it, that “lacked substantial justification” — a term the statute itself defines as substantially frivolous, substantially groundless, or substantially vexatious — or that the action or part of it was interposed for delay or harassment, or that an attorney or party unnecessarily expanded the proceeding through other improper conduct, expressly including abuses of the discovery procedures available under Chapter 11 of this title. Subsection (c) then draws a line courts are told to respect: no attorney or party can be assessed fees for a claim or defense the court finds was pressed in a good-faith attempt to establish a new theory of law in Georgia, so long as that theory rests on some recognized precedential or persuasive authority.
The remaining subsections govern how an award works in practice. Fees and expenses can’t exceed what’s reasonable and necessary to defend or assert the party’s rights, though the court may also award the fees spent obtaining the order itself. A motion for fees may come at any point during the case but must be filed no later than 45 days after the action’s final disposition. The award itself is a matter for the judge, not the jury, and once entered it functions as an enforceable money judgment.
Two more provisions round out the section. An award entered in a prior action between the same parties gets treated as court costs if either party files a subsequent action, and the whole section is off-limits in magistrate court — except that an appellee defending a magistrate court win can still recover litigation expenses incurred there if the appeal itself lacks substantial justification. It’s also worth knowing that this isn’t Georgia’s only frivolous-litigation fee statute: the offer-of-settlement provisions in Code Section 9-11-68(e) create a parallel route to fees for a frivolous claim or defense, but they require the party seeking fees to elect between that procedure and this one for the same claim or defense — a party can’t run both tracks side by side.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a party show to get a mandatory fee award under subsection (a)?
That the opposing claim, defense, or position rested on a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact — one no court could reasonably have been expected to accept. Once shown, the award is mandatory, though the court decides whether it falls on the party, the attorney, or both.
What are the discretionary grounds for a fee award under subsection (b)?
The court may assess fees if an attorney or party lacked substantial justification for bringing or defending the action (meaning it was substantially frivolous, groundless, or vexatious), interposed the action or part of it for delay or harassment, or unnecessarily expanded the proceeding through improper conduct, including abuses of discovery under Chapter 11.
Can a party be penalized for raising a novel legal argument in Georgia court?
Not if it’s raised in good faith. Subsection (c) protects a claim or defense asserted as a good-faith attempt to establish a new theory of law in Georgia, as long as it rests on some recognized precedential or persuasive authority.
Does a jury decide whether to award fees under this section?
No. Subsection (f) puts that decision with the court, not a jury, and the resulting order is enforceable as a money judgment.
Can a party recover fees for a frivolous claim or defense under both this section and Georgia’s offer-of-settlement statute?
No. Code Section 9-11-68(e) requires a party pursuing fees for a frivolous claim or defense to elect between that offer-of-settlement procedure and this Code section for the same claim or defense, rather than pursuing both.
Amendment History
Code 1981, § 9-15-14, enacted by Ga. L. 1986, p. 1591, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 397, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 437, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 856, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 689, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 967, § 1.