RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-15-14.Litigation costs and attorney’s fees assessed for frivolous actions and defenses

Chapter 15. Court and Litigation Costs · Last amended 2001 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceO.C.G.A. § 9-15-14 requires a court to award reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and litigation expenses to a party who faced a claim, defense, or position so devoid of any justiciable legal or factual issue that no court could reasonably have accepted it, and separately gives the court discretion to assess fees against a party or attorney who lacked substantial justification for bringing or defending an action, pursued it for delay or harassment, or unnecessarily expanded the proceeding through improper conduct such as discovery abuse.

Full Text of § 9-15-14

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) In any civil action in any court of record of this state, reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation shall be awarded to any party against whom another party has asserted a claim, defense, or other position with respect to which there existed such a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact that it could not be reasonably believed that a court would accept the asserted claim, defense, or other position. Attorney’s fees and expenses so awarded shall be assessed against the party asserting such claim, defense, or other position, or against that party’s attorney, or against both in such manner as is just.
(b) The court may assess reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation in any civil action in any court of record if, upon the motion of any party or the court itself, it finds that an attorney or party brought or defended an action, or any part thereof, that lacked substantial justification or that the action, or any part thereof, was interposed for delay or harassment, or if it finds that an attorney or party unnecessarily expanded the proceeding by other improper conduct, including, but not limited to, abuses of discovery procedures available under Chapter 11 of this title, the “Georgia Civil Practice Act.” As used in this Code section, “lacked substantial justification” means substantially frivolous, substantially groundless, or substantially vexatious.
(c) No attorney or party shall be assessed attorney’s fees as to any claim or defense which the court determines was asserted by said attorney or party in a good faith attempt to establish a new theory of law in Georgia if such new theory of law is based on some recognized precedential or persuasive authority.
(d) Attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation awarded under this Code section shall not exceed amounts which are reasonable and necessary for defending or asserting the rights of a party. Attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation incurred in obtaining an order of court pursuant to this Code section may also be assessed by the court and included in its order.
(e) Attorney’s fees and expenses under this Code section may be requested by motion at any time during the course of the action but not later than 45 days after the final disposition of the action.
(f) An award of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees or expenses of litigation under this Code section shall be determined by the court without a jury and shall be made by an order of court which shall constitute and be enforceable as a money judgment.
(g) Attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation awarded under this Code section in a prior action between the same parties shall be treated as court costs with regard to the filing of any subsequent action.
(h) This Code section shall not apply to proceedings in magistrate courts. However, when a case is appealed from the magistrate court, the appellee may seek litigation expenses incurred below if the appeal lacks substantial justification.

Plain-English Summary

Subsection (a) sets a mandatory standard. In any civil action in a court of record, a party who faced a claim, defense, or other position marked by a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact — one no court could reasonably have been expected to accept — shall be awarded reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and litigation expenses. The court decides who pays: the fees may be assessed against the party who advanced the claim or defense, against that party’s attorney, or against both, in whatever split the court finds just.

Subsection (b) supplies a second, discretionary path, reachable on the motion of any party or the court’s own initiative. The court may assess fees and expenses if it finds that an attorney or party brought or defended an action, or a part of it, that “lacked substantial justification” — a term the statute itself defines as substantially frivolous, substantially groundless, or substantially vexatious — or that the action or part of it was interposed for delay or harassment, or that an attorney or party unnecessarily expanded the proceeding through other improper conduct, expressly including abuses of the discovery procedures available under Chapter 11 of this title. Subsection (c) then draws a line courts are told to respect: no attorney or party can be assessed fees for a claim or defense the court finds was pressed in a good-faith attempt to establish a new theory of law in Georgia, so long as that theory rests on some recognized precedential or persuasive authority.

The remaining subsections govern how an award works in practice. Fees and expenses can’t exceed what’s reasonable and necessary to defend or assert the party’s rights, though the court may also award the fees spent obtaining the order itself. A motion for fees may come at any point during the case but must be filed no later than 45 days after the action’s final disposition. The award itself is a matter for the judge, not the jury, and once entered it functions as an enforceable money judgment.

Two more provisions round out the section. An award entered in a prior action between the same parties gets treated as court costs if either party files a subsequent action, and the whole section is off-limits in magistrate court — except that an appellee defending a magistrate court win can still recover litigation expenses incurred there if the appeal itself lacks substantial justification. It’s also worth knowing that this isn’t Georgia’s only frivolous-litigation fee statute: the offer-of-settlement provisions in Code Section 9-11-68(e) create a parallel route to fees for a frivolous claim or defense, but they require the party seeking fees to elect between that procedure and this one for the same claim or defense — a party can’t run both tracks side by side.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a party show to get a mandatory fee award under subsection (a)?

That the opposing claim, defense, or position rested on a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact — one no court could reasonably have been expected to accept. Once shown, the award is mandatory, though the court decides whether it falls on the party, the attorney, or both.

What are the discretionary grounds for a fee award under subsection (b)?

The court may assess fees if an attorney or party lacked substantial justification for bringing or defending the action (meaning it was substantially frivolous, groundless, or vexatious), interposed the action or part of it for delay or harassment, or unnecessarily expanded the proceeding through improper conduct, including abuses of discovery under Chapter 11.

Can a party be penalized for raising a novel legal argument in Georgia court?

Not if it’s raised in good faith. Subsection (c) protects a claim or defense asserted as a good-faith attempt to establish a new theory of law in Georgia, as long as it rests on some recognized precedential or persuasive authority.

Does a jury decide whether to award fees under this section?

No. Subsection (f) puts that decision with the court, not a jury, and the resulting order is enforceable as a money judgment.

Can a party recover fees for a frivolous claim or defense under both this section and Georgia’s offer-of-settlement statute?

No. Code Section 9-11-68(e) requires a party pursuing fees for a frivolous claim or defense to elect between that offer-of-settlement procedure and this Code section for the same claim or defense, rather than pursuing both.

Amendment History

Code 1981, § 9-15-14, enacted by Ga. L. 1986, p. 1591, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 397, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 437, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 856, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 689, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 967, § 1.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia frivolous litigation attorney feesgeorgia sanctions lack of substantial justificationsubstantially frivolous groundless vexatious georgiaattorney fees complete absence of justiciable issuegeorgia bad faith litigation fee shifting