§ 1722.Need to Promote Uniformity of Law
Title 11. Money Judgments of Other Jurisdictions · Chapter 2. Foreign-Country Money Judgments · Enacted 2007 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 1722
Plain-English Summary
Because this chapter enacts a uniform law meant to apply across many states, this section reminds courts of that shared purpose whenever a question of interpretation arises. In applying and construing this chapter, a court should give weight to the goal of promoting uniformity of the law among the states that have adopted their own version of the same act.
That instruction points courts toward looking at how other enacting states have resolved similar questions, rather than developing an entirely California-specific reading of language shared across many jurisdictions. Keeping interpretations consistent from state to state serves the underlying reason a uniform law exists in the first place: so a litigant does not face a fundamentally different recognition standard depending only on which enacting state happens to hear the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does this section matter when interpreting the chapter's other provisions?
It directs courts to weigh the value of uniform interpretation across the various states that have adopted this same act, rather than reading the language in isolation.
Does this mean California courts must follow another state's interpretation of the same law?
Not automatically, but Section 1722 tells courts to give real consideration to promoting consistency with how other enacting states construe the same uniform provisions.
Amendment History
Added by Stats 2007 ch 212 (SB 639),s 2, eff. 1/1/2008.