RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 1568.Selection Criteria For Custodians of Escheated Digital Financial Assets

Title 10. Unclaimed Property · Chapter 7. Unclaimed Property Law · Article 5. Administration of Unclaimed Property · Enacted 2025 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 1568 authorizes the Controller to select one or more licensed custodians to manage and safeguard escheated digital financial assets, weighing factors like security, key management capability, experience, regulatory compliance, reporting practices, and the custodian's ability to reunite owners with their assets.

Full Text of § 1568

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) The Controller may select one or more custodians for the management and safekeeping of digital financial assets that have escheated to the state. Any entity selected as a custodian shall hold a valid license issued by the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 3201) of Division 1.25 of the Financial Code.
(b) If the Controller selects a custodian pursuant to subdivision (a), the Controller shall consider the following criteria in making the selection:
(1) Storage security to ensure the safekeeping of digital financial assets, including robust cybersecurity measures to prevent unauthorized access.
(2) Capability to manage private keys associated with digital financial assets and ensure the ability to transfer or transact with the assets when required.
(3) Proven experience in handling digital financial assets.
(4) Compliance with all applicable federal and state regulations related to digital financial asset custody.
(5) Regular reporting mechanisms to the Controller regarding the status and value of the digital financial assets in their custody.
(6) Processes to reunite owners with their digital financial assets, including maintaining updated contact records and issuing timely notifications.
(7) Qualifying as a "financial institution" under Chapter X of Title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which subjects the qualified custodian to the anti-money laundering obligations of the federal Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. Sec.5311 et seq.), in addition to any state-imposed anti-money laundering obligations.
(8) Any other factor that the Controller deems relevant.

Plain-English Summary

Cryptocurrency and other digital financial assets that escheat to the state need specialized handling that an ordinary storage vault can't provide, and Section 1568 gives the Controller the authority to bring in outside expertise. The Controller may select one or more custodians to manage and safeguard digital financial assets that have escheated, but any entity chosen for that role has to hold a valid license from the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation under the Financial Code's digital financial asset licensing chapter.

In choosing among licensed candidates, the Controller weighs a set of practical factors: how securely the custodian stores the assets against unauthorized access, whether it can manage the private keys needed to transfer or transact with the assets when the time comes, its track record handling digital financial assets, its compliance with applicable federal and state rules, how regularly it reports back to the Controller on the assets' status and value, and its processes for reuniting owners with their property, including keeping contact records current and sending timely notifications. The Controller also considers whether the custodian qualifies as a “financial institution” under the federal Bank Secrecy Act framework, which brings its own anti-money-laundering obligations, along with any other factor the Controller considers relevant.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Controller hire an outside company to manage escheated cryptocurrency?

Yes. Section 1568 lets the Controller select one or more custodians for digital financial assets, provided each holds a valid license from the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

What does the Controller consider when choosing a custodian?

Factors including storage security, the ability to manage private keys, experience with digital financial assets, regulatory compliance, regular reporting to the Controller, and processes for reuniting owners with their assets.

Does the custodian have to comply with anti-money-laundering rules?

The Controller considers whether the custodian qualifies as a “financial institution” under the federal Bank Secrecy Act framework, which carries anti-money-laundering obligations, alongside any applicable state-imposed obligations.

Is the list of selection factors in this section exhaustive?

No. The section also lets the Controller weigh any other factor considered relevant beyond the specific criteria listed.

Amendment History

Added by Stats 2025 ch 660 (SB 822),s 8, eff. 1/1/2026.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: digital financial asset custodian controller californiacryptocurrency unclaimed property custody