Rule 3.2222.Filing and service
Division 22. Petitions Under the California Environmental Quality Act · Chapter 2. California Environmental Quality Act Proceedings Involving Streamlined CEQA Projects · Article 1. General Provisions · Last amended 2022 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.2222
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3.2222 sets the filing and service ground rules for cases brought under the streamlined CEQA fast-track. Filing defaults to electronic filing unless the court itself lacks the capability. Service works differently depending on the document: the petition itself must reach every party by personal service, while everything filed afterward can go out personally or electronically. Parties with lawyers are treated as having agreed to electronic service automatically; self-represented litigants have to opt in.
Where a party serves the petition depends on which kind of streamlined project the case involves. Actions touching the Sacramento arena project follow the separate service rules in Article 2. For every other streamlined project, the rule leans on a deadline with teeth: if the petitioner does not personally serve the respondent agency, the real party in interest, and the Attorney General within three court days of filing, the petitioner’s own merits-brief deadline starts shrinking, losing a day for every two additional court days the service slips, unless the court finds good cause to excuse the delay.
The rule closes with a pointed exception. Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 normally gives a party extra time to act after being served electronically. That extension does not apply here, which keeps the compressed schedule from stretching back out through electronic service.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
Parties should note that, while Public Resources Code section 21167 provides the statute of limitations for filing petitions under the California Environment Quality Act, these rules provide an incentive for parties to file actions governed by these rules more quickly, in the form of extra briefing time for petitioners who file within 10 days of the issuance of a Notice of Determination. See rule 3.2227(a).
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the petition in a streamlined CEQA case have to be served in person?
Yes. Rule 3.2222(b) requires personal service of the petition itself, even though later documents in the case may be served personally or electronically.
What happens if a petitioner is slow to serve a streamlined CEQA petition?
Under Rule 3.2222(d), if the respondent agency, real party in interest, and Attorney General are not personally served within three court days of filing, the petitioner’s deadline for its merits brief shrinks by a day for every two extra court days of delay, absent a court order excusing it for good cause.
Does electronic service give a party extra time to respond in these cases?
No. Rule 3.2222(e) exempts these actions from the additional time Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 normally allows after electronic service.
Amendment History
Rule 3.2222 amended effective March 11, 2022; adopted effective July 1, 2014; previously amended effective January 1, 2017.