RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.2223.Petition

Division 22. Petitions Under the California Environmental Quality Act · Chapter 2. California Environmental Quality Act Proceedings Involving Streamlined CEQA Projects · Article 1. General Provisions · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceRule 3.2223 spells out what a petition in a streamlined CEQA case must say on its face — that it is a Streamlined CEQA Project, which statutory category the project falls under, any required cost-payment notice, and a verification — on top of the ordinary pleading requirements.

Full Text of Rule 3.2223

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

In addition to any other applicable requirements, the petition must:
(1) On the first page, directly below the case number, indicate that the matter is a “Streamlined CEQA Project”;
(2) State one of the following:
(A) The proponent of the project at issue provided notice to the lead agency that it was proceeding under Public Resources Code section 21168.6.6, 21168.6.7, 21168.6.8, or 21168.6.9 (whichever is applicable) and is subject to this rule; or
(B) The proponent of the project at issue provided notice to the lead agency that it was proceeding under Public Resources Code sections 21189.80–21189.91 and is subject to this rule; or
(C) The project at issue was certified by the Governor as an environmental leadership development project under Public Resources Code sections 21182– 21184 and is subject to this rule; or
(D) The project at issue is an Old Town Center project as defined by Public Resources Code section 21189.70 and is subject to this rule;
(3) If an environmental leadership media campus project, environmental leadership development project, Oakland ballpark project, Inglewood arena project, energy infrastructure project, semiconductor or microelectronic project, or water-related project, provide notice that the person or entity that applied for certification of the project as such a project must make the payments required by rule 3.2240 and, if the matter goes to the Court of Appeal, the payments required by rule 8.705;
(4) If an environmental leadership transit project, provide notice that the project applicant must make the payments required by rule 3.2240 and, if the matter goes to the Court of Appeal, the payments required by rule 8.705; and
(5) Be verified.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 3.2223 turns the general label “streamlined CEQA project” into something a court clerk and opposing counsel can spot at a glance. The petition must flag its own status directly below the case number on the first page, so nobody has to dig through the pleading to learn that expedited procedures apply.

The petition then has to identify which statutory track put it there — the project proponent’s notice to the lead agency that it invoked one of the specific streamlined statutes, the Governor’s certification of an environmental leadership project, or the project’s status as an Old Town Center project. For several of the categories carrying mandatory trial-court cost payments — media campus, leadership development, the Oakland ballpark and Inglewood arena projects, energy infrastructure and semiconductor projects, water-related projects, and leadership transit projects — the petition must also alert the applicant that it owes the payments described in Rule 3.2240, and the further payments due if the case reaches the Court of Appeal.

Finally, the petition must be verified, meaning the petitioner swears to its contents under penalty of perjury rather than merely asserting them through counsel. That formality matters more here than in an ordinary civil complaint, given how quickly the rest of the streamlined schedule moves once the case is filed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does a streamlined CEQA petition have to identify itself as such?

Directly below the case number on the first page, as Rule 3.2223(1) requires.

Does a streamlined CEQA petition have to say which statute it is filed under?

Yes. Rule 3.2223(2) requires the petition to state which of the specific Public Resources Code streamlined-review categories applies, based on the notice given to the lead agency or the Governor’s certification.

Does the petition have to mention the trial court cost payments required for these projects?

For several project categories, yes. Rule 3.2223(3) and (4) require the petition to give notice that the applicant must make the payments described in Rule 3.2240.

Must a streamlined CEQA petition be verified?

Yes. Rule 3.2223(5) requires verification, meaning the petitioner attests to the petition’s contents under oath.

Amendment History

Rule 3.2223 amended effective July 1, 2025; adopted effective July 1, 2014; previously amended effective January 1, 2017, March 11, 2022, January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023.

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: streamlined CEQA petition requirementshow to caption a streamlined CEQA project petitionCEQA petition verification requirement California