RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 97.002.Limit on Liability of Certain Highway, Road, and Street Contractors

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 97. Liability of Persons Providing Services for a Governmental Unit · Last amended 2003 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 97.002 relieves a highway contractor working for the Texas Department of Transportation of liability where it complied with the contract documents material to the condition that caused the harm.

Full Text of § 97.002

Text size

A contractor who constructs or repairs a highway, road, or street for the Texas Department of Transportation is not liable to a claimant for personal injury, property damage, or death arising from the performance of the construction or repair if, at the time of the personal injury, property damage, or death, the contractor is in compliance with contract documents material to the condition or defect that was the proximate cause of the personal injury, property damage, or death.
End

Plain-English Summary

A contractor protection turning entirely on compliance with the contract.

A contractor who constructs or repairs a highway, road, or street for the Texas Department of Transportation is not liable for personal injury, property damage, or death arising from the performance of the construction or repair if, at the time, the contractor is in compliance with contract documents material to the condition or defect that was the proximate cause of the harm.

The reasoning is that the design is not the contractor's. The Department specifies the geometry, the materials, the signage, and the traffic control, and the contractor builds what it is told to build.

Holding a contractor liable for a design it did not choose and could not change would make it an insurer of the state's engineering judgment.

The compliance test is precisely scoped. It is not general compliance with the whole contract — it is compliance with the contract documents material to the condition or defect that was the proximate cause.

So a contractor in breach of some unrelated provision keeps the protection, and one that departed from the specification for the thing that caused the harm loses it.

The Department itself remains subject to the Tort Claims Act, with its discretionary function exclusion covering the design decisions this section attributes to it. The two provisions together mean a road design claim is difficult against either party.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a highway contractor liable for a road defect in Texas?

Not if, at the time, it was in compliance with the contract documents material to the condition or defect that proximately caused the harm.

Does any breach of contract remove the protection?

No. Only non-compliance with the documents material to the condition or defect that caused the harm.

Can I sue the Department instead?

The Department is subject to the Tort Claims Act, whose discretionary function exclusion covers design decisions.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 584, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source