RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 87.004.Exceptions to Limitation on Liability

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 87. Liability Arising from Farm Animals · Last amended 2021 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 87.004 excepts six situations from the limitation, including faulty equipment, failure to assess the participant's ability, an undisclosed latent land condition, and wilful or wanton disregard.

Full Text of § 87.004

Text size

A person, including a farm animal activity sponsor, farm animal professional, farm owner or lessee, livestock show participant, or livestock show sponsor, may be liable for property damage or damages arising from the personal injury or death caused by a participant in a farm animal activity or livestock show if:
(1)the injury or death was caused by faulty equipment or tack used in the farm animal activity or livestock show, the person provided the equipment or tack, and the person knew or should have known that the equipment or tack was faulty;
(2)the person provided the farm animal or livestock animal and the person did not make a reasonable and prudent effort to determine the ability of the participant to engage safely in the farm animal activity, including a work activity, or livestock show and determine the ability of the participant to safely manage the farm animal or livestock animal, taking into account the participant's representations of ability;
(3)the injury or death was caused by a dangerous latent condition of land for which warning signs, written notices, or verbal warnings were not conspicuously posted or provided to the participant, and the land was owned, leased, or otherwise under the control of the person at the time of the injury or death and the person knew of the dangerous latent condition;
(4)the person committed an act or omission with wilful or wanton disregard for the safety of the participant and that act or omission caused the injury;
(5)the person intentionally caused the property damage, injury, or death; or
(6)with respect to a livestock show, the injury or death occurred as a result of an activity connected with the livestock show and the person invited or otherwise allowed the injured or deceased person to participate in the activity and the injured or deceased person was not a participant as defined by Section 87.001(9)(B).
End

Plain-English Summary

The exceptions, and they are the substance of the chapter.

(1) Faulty equipment or tack used in the activity, where the person provided it and knew or should have known it was faulty.

(2) Failure to assess the participant. Where the person provided the animal and did not make a reasonable and prudent effort to determine the participant's ability to engage safely in the activity and to safely manage the animal.

That is the exception most often litigated. Putting an inexperienced rider on a difficult horse without asking about their experience is outside the protection, and the duty is to make a reasonable and prudent effort to find out.

(3) A dangerous latent condition of land for which warning signs, written notices, or verbal warnings were not conspicuously posted or provided, where the land was under the person's control and the person knew of the condition.

Note the interaction with the inherent risk list. Surface and subsurface land conditions are an inherent risk of equine activities under that section — but a latent condition the operator knew about and did not warn of is an exception. Known and hidden defeats inherent.

(4) An act or omission with wilful or wanton disregard for the participant's safety that caused the injury. (5) Intentionally causing the damage, injury, or death.

(6) A livestock show injury from an activity connected with the show, where the person invited or allowed the injured person to participate and they were not a participant as defined.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is a Texas horse operation liable?

For faulty equipment it provided and knew or should have known was faulty, for failing to make a reasonable effort to assess the participant's ability where it provided the animal, for a known latent land condition it did not warn of, for wilful or wanton disregard, for intentional injury, and for certain livestock show invitees.

What is the duty to assess a rider?

Where the person provided the animal, to make a reasonable and prudent effort to determine the participant's ability to engage safely and to safely manage the animal.

Are land conditions an inherent risk or an exception?

Both, depending. Surface and subsurface conditions are an inherent risk of equine activities, but a known latent condition not warned of is an exception.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 549, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
  • Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1108, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 896 (S.B. 479), Sec. 4, eff. June 17, 2011.
  • Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. 219 (H.B. 365), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2021.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source