RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 75E.002.Limited Liability

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 75E. Limited Liability for Motorized Off-Road Vehicle Activities · Last amended 2025 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 75E.002 shields a motorized off-road vehicle entity that posted the sign, with a gross negligence standard for area safety, ordinary negligence for entity-provided vehicles, and no attractive nuisance claim.

Full Text of § 75E.002

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a)Except as provided by Subsection (b), a motorized off-road vehicle entity is not liable to any person for a motorized off-road vehicle activity participant injury, if, at the time of the motorized off-road vehicle activity participant injury, the warning prescribed by Section 75E.003 was posted in accordance with that section.
(b)This section does not limit liability for an injury:
(1)proximately caused by:
(A)the motorized off-road vehicle entity's:
(i)gross negligence or intentional misconduct with regard to the safety of the motorized off-road vehicle area or the motorized off-road vehicle activity participant; or
(ii)negligence with regard to a motorized off-road vehicle or related equipment provided by the entity to the participant;
(B)a potentially dangerous condition at the motorized off-road vehicle area, other than a potentially dangerous condition inherent to driving a vehicle in a motorized off-road vehicle area, including unstable roads, surfaces, or subsurfaces or natural or man- made obstacles, of which the motorized off-road vehicle entity knew or reasonably should have known; or
(C)the motorized off-road vehicle entity's failure to train or improper training of an employee of the motorized off-road vehicle entity actively involved in the motorized off-road vehicle area or a motorized off-road vehicle activity; or
(2)intentionally caused by the motorized off-road vehicle entity.
(c)The doctrine of attractive nuisance does not apply to a claim made by a person for an injury that occurred in a motorized off-road vehicle area.
End

Plain-English Summary

The protection, and its exceptions depart from the template in two significant ways.

The entity is not liable for a participant injury if, at the time, the prescribed warning was posted.

The first exception splits into two standards, which no other chapter in the series does.

Gross negligence or intentional misconduct with regard to the safety of the area or the participant — a much higher bar than the ordinary negligence the other four chapters use. But ordinary negligence with regard to a motorized off-road vehicle or related equipment provided by the entity to the participant.

The distinction is coherent. Riding off-road is dangerous by nature and the operator is protected against ordinary negligence in running the area — but if the operator hands over the machine, it must be maintained with reasonable care.

The second exception carves out inherent risk explicitly. A potentially dangerous condition at the area is an exception other than a potentially dangerous condition inherent to driving a vehicle in a motorized off-road vehicle area, including unstable roads, surfaces, or subsurfaces or natural or man-made obstacles.

Rough ground and obstacles are the point of the activity, and naming them keeps them out of the exception.

Subsection (c) disapplies attractive nuisance to any claim for an injury occurring in the area — following the electric utility and community garden provisions in the recreational use chapter.

Frequently Asked Questions

What standard applies to an off-road park operator in Texas?

Gross negligence or intentional misconduct for the safety of the area or participant, but ordinary negligence for a vehicle or related equipment the entity provided to the participant.

Are rough surfaces an exception?

No. A potentially dangerous condition inherent to driving in the area — including unstable roads, surfaces, subsurfaces, and natural or man-made obstacles — is expressly excluded from the exception.

Does attractive nuisance apply?

No. The doctrine does not apply to a claim for an injury that occurred in a motorized off-road vehicle area.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1123 (H.B. 5624), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2025.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source