RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 72.052.Bifurcated Trial in Certain Commercial Motor Vehicle Collision Actions

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 72. Liability of Motor Vehicle Owner or Operator · Subchapter B. Actions Regarding Commercial Motor Vehicles · Last amended 2023 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 72.052 entitles a defendant to a bifurcated trial in a commercial motor vehicle collision case, on motion filed within 120 days of its answer.

Full Text of § 72.052

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a)In a civil action under this subchapter, on motion by a defendant, the court shall provide for a bifurcated trial under this section.
(b)A motion under this section shall be made on or before the later of:
(1)the 120th day after the date the defendant bringing the motion files the defendant's original answer; or
(2)the 30th day after the date a claimant files a pleading adding a claim or cause of action against the defendant bringing the motion.
(c)The trier of fact shall determine liability for and the amount of compensatory damages in the first phase of a bifurcated trial under this section.
(d)The trier of fact shall determine liability for and the amount of exemplary damages in the second phase of a bifurcated trial under this section.
(e)For purposes of this section, a finding by the trier of fact in the first phase of a bifurcated trial that an employee defendant was negligent in operating an employer defendant's commercial motor vehicle may serve as a basis for the claimant to proceed in the second phase of the trial on a claim against the employer defendant, such as negligent entrustment, that requires a finding by the trier of fact that the employee was negligent in operating the vehicle as a prerequisite to the employer defendant being found negligent in relation to the employee defendant's operation of the vehicle. This subsection does not apply to a claimant who has pursued a claim described by this subsection in the first phase of a trial that is bifurcated under this section.
End

Plain-English Summary

The procedural core of the subchapter, and the split it makes is different from the general bifurcation rule.

On motion by a defendant, the court shall provide for a bifurcated trial. The motion is due by the later of 120 days after the defendant files its original answer, or 30 days after a claimant files a pleading adding a claim against that defendant.

The first phase determines liability for and the amount of compensatory damages. The second phase determines liability for and the amount of exemplary damages.

Compare the general bifurcation provision in the damages chapter, where the first phase decides liability for both compensatory and exemplary damages and only the amount of exemplary damages moves to the second. Here, liability for exemplary damages moves as well.

That is a substantially larger separation, and it is what the subchapter is for. Evidence of a carrier's hiring, training, and safety record — the material that supports a gross negligence claim — is kept out of the phase deciding whether the driver was negligent.

Subsection (e) supplies the bridge between phases. A first-phase finding that an employee defendant was negligent in operating the employer's vehicle may serve as a basis for the claimant to proceed in the second phase on a claim against the employer, such as negligent entrustment, that requires such a finding as a prerequisite.

So the direct-negligence claims against the company are not lost — they are deferred, and the first-phase finding unlocks them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a trucking company get a bifurcated trial in Texas?

Yes. On a defendant's motion the court shall bifurcate, if the motion is filed by the later of 120 days after that defendant's original answer or 30 days after a claim is added against it.

What is decided in each phase?

The first phase decides liability for and the amount of compensatory damages. The second decides liability for and the amount of exemplary damages.

How does that differ from the usual bifurcation rule?

Under Chapter 41 only the amount of exemplary damages moves to the second phase. Here liability for them moves too, which is a larger separation.

Are direct claims against the company lost?

No. A first-phase finding that the employee was negligent lets the claimant proceed in the second phase on claims such as negligent entrustment.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. 785 (H.B. 19), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2021.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 709 (H.B. 2190), Sec. 116, eff. September 1, 2023.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source