RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 34.066.Improper Sale

Title 2. Trial, Judgment, and Appeal · Subtitle C. Judgments · Chapter 34. Execution on Judgments · Subchapter D. Duties and Liabilities of Executing Officer · Last amended 2007 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 34.066 limits an officer’s liability for selling without proper notice, or otherwise than as prescribed, to actual damages the injured party proves.

Full Text of § 34.066

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)If an officer sells property without giving notice as required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure or sells property in a manner other than that prescribed by this chapter and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the officer shall be liable only for actual damages sustained by the injured party.
(b)The injured party has the burden to prove that the sale was improper and any actual damages suffered.
End

Plain-English Summary

A liability rule for a defective sale, and it is short because the substantive requirements live elsewhere.

The officer shall be liable only for actual damages sustained by the injured party where the officer sells property without giving notice as required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure or sells property in a manner other than that prescribed by this chapter and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Two failures are covered, and they are different in kind. Failing to give notice is an omission before the sale; selling in an improper manner is a defect in how it was conducted.

Notice is what produces bidders, and its absence usually shows up in the price — which is how damages from a notice failure are measured in practice.

The manner requirements come from this chapter and from the rules together: the first Tuesday timing, the designated place, separate offering of city lots, the debtor’s right to divide rural land, and the rules’ own procedures for advertising and conducting the sale.

The injured party has the burden to prove that the sale was improper and any actual damages suffered.

Both halves have to be proved, and the second is the harder one. Establishing that notice was defective is a matter of record; establishing what the property would have fetched had the sale been proper requires evidence about a sale that never happened.

"Only for actual damages" repeats the chapter’s pattern, and it means an improper sale supports compensation rather than a penalty.

Note who may claim: "the injured party". That can be the debtor, whose property sold for too little, or the creditor, whose judgment went unsatisfied — the section does not confine it to either.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if property is sold without proper notice?

The officer is liable for actual damages sustained by the injured party.

What must the claimant prove?

That the sale was improper, and any actual damages suffered.

Can the sale itself be undone?

This section provides a damages remedy. Purchaser protection elsewhere in the chapter is what makes damages rather than unwinding the usual route.

Amendment History

  • Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 421 (S.B. 1269), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2007.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source