§ 171.095.Service of Process for Subsequent Applications
Title 7. Alternate Methods of Dispute Resolution · Chapter 171. General Arbitration · Subchapter D. Court Proceedings · Last amended 2025 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 171.095
Plain-English Summary
The second and later applications, and the shortcut has conditions.
Notice is given as for a motion in a pending civil action in a district court or the business court.
The first condition is jurisdiction. Jurisdiction over the adverse party must already have been established by service of process on the party or in rem for the initial application.
The second condition has two parts. The subsequent application must relate to the same arbitration or a prospective arbitration under the same agreement, and to the same controversy or controversies.
Both parts are needed. A new dispute under the same clause does not qualify, and neither does the same dispute under a different agreement.
Anything else requires full service. If the conditions are not met, service is made in the manner provided by Section 171.094.
The rule matches how these matters unfold. One arbitration can generate several applications — to compel, to appoint, to enforce a subpoena, to confirm — and re-serving process each time would serve nobody.
The conditions keep the shortcut honest. The adverse party has already been brought before the court on this arbitration and this controversy, and knows the proceeding is live.
Section 171.093 supplies the hearing rules for these applications, so the motion analogy carries through from notice to hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is a later application served?
Like a motion in a pending civil action, if jurisdiction over the adverse party was established for the initial application and the application concerns the same arbitration agreement and controversy.
What if those conditions are not met?
Service is made in the manner provided by Section 171.094.
Does a new dispute under the same clause qualify?
No. The application must relate to the same controversy or controversies.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
- Amended by:
- Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 912 (H.B. 40), Sec. 29, eff. September 1, 2025.