RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 171.095.Service of Process for Subsequent Applications

Title 7. Alternate Methods of Dispute Resolution · Chapter 171. General Arbitration · Subchapter D. Court Proceedings · Last amended 2025 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 171.095 lets a subsequent application be noticed like a motion in a pending case where jurisdiction has been established and the application concerns the same arbitration agreement and controversy, and otherwise requires full service.

Full Text of § 171.095

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)After an initial application has been made, notice to an adverse party for each subsequent application shall be made in the same manner as is required for a motion filed in a pending civil action in a district court or the business court, as applicable. This subsection applies only if:
(1)jurisdiction over the adverse party has been established by service of process on the party or in rem for the initial application; and
(2)the subsequent application relates to:
(A)the same arbitration or a prospective arbitration under the same agreement to arbitrate; and
(B)the same controversy or controversies.
(b)If Subsection (a) does not apply, service of process shall be made on the adverse party in the manner provided by Section 171.094.
End

Plain-English Summary

The second and later applications, and the shortcut has conditions.

Notice is given as for a motion in a pending civil action in a district court or the business court.

The first condition is jurisdiction. Jurisdiction over the adverse party must already have been established by service of process on the party or in rem for the initial application.

The second condition has two parts. The subsequent application must relate to the same arbitration or a prospective arbitration under the same agreement, and to the same controversy or controversies.

Both parts are needed. A new dispute under the same clause does not qualify, and neither does the same dispute under a different agreement.

Anything else requires full service. If the conditions are not met, service is made in the manner provided by Section 171.094.

The rule matches how these matters unfold. One arbitration can generate several applications — to compel, to appoint, to enforce a subpoena, to confirm — and re-serving process each time would serve nobody.

The conditions keep the shortcut honest. The adverse party has already been brought before the court on this arbitration and this controversy, and knows the proceeding is live.

Section 171.093 supplies the hearing rules for these applications, so the motion analogy carries through from notice to hearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is a later application served?

Like a motion in a pending civil action, if jurisdiction over the adverse party was established for the initial application and the application concerns the same arbitration agreement and controversy.

What if those conditions are not met?

Service is made in the manner provided by Section 171.094.

Does a new dispute under the same clause qualify?

No. The application must relate to the same controversy or controversies.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 912 (H.B. 40), Sec. 29, eff. September 1, 2025.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source