§ 17.033.Substituted Service Through Social Media Presence
Title 2. Trial, Judgment, and Appeal · Subtitle B. Trial Matters · Chapter 17. Parties; Citation; Long-Arm Jurisdiction · Subchapter B. Citation Generally · Last amended 2020 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 17.033
Plain-English Summary
A 2019 addition, effective June 2020, and the newest service method in Texas law.
If substituted service is already authorized under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may prescribe as a method an electronic communication sent to the defendant through a social media presence — in accordance with rules the supreme court is directed to adopt.
The first clause is the gate, and it is easily overlooked. This is not a primary method of service. It becomes available only once substituted service is authorized in the ordinary way — which requires a showing that personal service and service at the defendant's usual place of abode have been attempted without success.
The provision recognises a real change in how people are reachable. A defendant who has moved without a forwarding address, whose last known residence is stale, and who cannot be found by an ordinary skip trace may still be posting daily under their own name.
Subsection (b) makes the rulemaking mandatory — the supreme court shall adopt rules — so the operating detail lives in the rules rather than the statute. The court supervises the method case by case, deciding whether a particular account belongs to the defendant and whether a message to it is reasonably calculated to give notice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you be served through social media in Texas?
Yes, as a method of substituted service, but only where substituted service is already authorized under the rules and the court prescribes it.
Is this a primary method of service?
No. Substituted service must first be authorized, which requires showing that ordinary service has been attempted without success.
Who decides whether the account is really the defendant's?
The court, applying the rules the supreme court is directed to adopt, prescribes the method in the particular case.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 606 (S.B. 891), Sec. 10.04(a), eff. June 1, 2020.