§ 17.005.Suit Against Unknown Landowner
Title 2. Trial, Judgment, and Appeal · Subtitle B. Trial Matters · Chapter 17. Parties; Citation; Long-Arm Jurisdiction · Subchapter A. Parties to Suit · Last amended 1985 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 17.005
Plain-English Summary
The more technical companion to the unknown-heirs provision, addressing interests held behind a name that does not appear in the record.
A person may sue the unknown owner or claimant of an interest in land if the plaintiff claims ownership of an interest or has a claim related to the land against that unknown owner, and the unknown owner falls into one of two categories.
The first is someone who takes or holds a beneficial interest under a conveyance, lease, or written contract that conveyed the interest to a trustee without disclosing the name of the beneficial owner. The record shows the trustee; the owner is invisible.
The second is someone holding the interest of a dissolved association, joint-stock company, partnership, or other organization under an instrument that did not disclose their name, where the organization itself had acquired the interest in its own name without naming its members, shareholders, or partners.
Subsection (b) draws a line at corporations, and then partly erases it. A person may not sue the unknown stockholders of a corporation under this section. But if the plaintiff did not know the organization was incorporated and the corporate character was not disclosed in the instrument under which title was acquired, the court retains jurisdiction over the unknown owners even if the organization was in fact incorporated.
That saving clause protects a plaintiff who reasonably read a record that concealed the true nature of the entity. A judgment is not undone by a fact the instrument itself hid.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue an unknown owner of land?
Yes, where you claim an interest or have a related claim and the unknown owner holds through an undisclosed beneficial interest under a trustee conveyance, or through a dissolved organization that did not name its members.
Does this cover unknown corporate stockholders?
Not directly — the section excludes them. But if you did not know the organization was incorporated and the instrument did not disclose it, the court keeps jurisdiction even though it was in fact a corporation.
What problem does this solve?
Land interests held behind a name that does not appear in the record, so the true owner cannot be identified from the instruments themselves.
Amendment History
- Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.