§ 149.003.Limitations on Successor Asbestos-Related Liabilities
Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 149. Limitations in Civil Actions of Liabilities Relating to Certain Mergers or Consolidations · Last amended 2003 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 149.003
Plain-English Summary
The operative limit, stated in two sentences.
Subsection (a): the cumulative successor asbestos-related liabilities of a corporation are limited to the fair market value of the total gross assets of the transferor determined as of the time of the merger or consolidation. The corporation does not have any responsibility for liabilities in excess of that.
"Cumulative" is the essential word. The cap is not per claim or per claimant — it is a single ceiling across every asbestos claim the successor ever faces, and each payment draws it down.
The principle is that a successor should not inherit more than it acquired. A corporation that bought a business worth $10 million in 1960 should not face $500 million in liabilities that came with it and could not have been known.
Whether that is right is a real question, and worth stating plainly. The cap protects the acquirer’s shareholders, and its cost falls on claimants whose claims exceed it — people injured by a product the transferor made, who recover a fraction or nothing.
The Legislature chose the successor, on the reasoning that without the cap corporations would be exposed to unlimited liability from transactions completed before the risk was understood.
Subsection (b) handles chained mergers. Where the transferor had itself assumed asbestos liabilities in an earlier merger, the total assets of that prior transferor, valued at the earlier merger, are substituted for the cap.
So the ceiling is set by the original source of the liability, and a chain of transactions cannot raise it.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the cap on successor asbestos liability?
The fair market value of the transferor’s total gross assets at the time of the merger or consolidation.
Is it per claim?
No. It is cumulative across every asbestos claim, and each payment draws it down.
What if there were several mergers?
The assets of the prior transferor, valued at the earlier merger, are substituted — so the original source sets the ceiling.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 204, Sec. 17.01, eff. June 11, 2003.