§ 121.010.Form of Certificate for Proof by Witness
Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 121. Acknowledgments and Proofs of Written Instruments · Last amended 1985 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 121.010
Plain-English Summary
The certificate that records what the witness swore, and it tracks the proof section clause by clause.
Where execution is proved by a witness, the certificate of the officer must be substantially as follows — again a model rather than a script.
It opens with the state and county, then the officer’s appearance line naming "the name and character of the officer".
The witness is identified next: "known to me (or proved to me on the oath of ____)", which reproduces the two identification routes the proof section allows and omits the identification-document route the acknowledgment form carries.
The witness is then described by role — "the person whose name is subscribed as a witness to the foregoing instrument" — rather than as the person who executed it, which is the difference between proof and acknowledgment.
The substance follows: "after being duly sworn by me stated on oath that he saw ____, the grantor or person who executed the foregoing instrument, subscribe the same", with the alternative in parentheses that the signer "acknowledged in his presence that he had executed the same".
Both limbs of the statutory oath appear, and the form ends with the second: "that he had signed the same as a witness at the request of the grantor".
The certificate closes with the seal and date, in the same words the acknowledgment form uses.
Reading the form is the quickest way to understand the proof procedure, because it states in order everything the officer must establish.
Frequently Asked Questions
What certificate is used for proof by a witness?
The form in this section, recording the witness’s identity, their oath about the execution, and that they signed at the grantor’s request.
How does it differ from an acknowledgment certificate?
It identifies the person as a subscribing witness rather than as the person who executed the instrument, and records sworn testimony.
Must it be exact?
No. It must be substantially in that form.
Amendment History
- Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.